Håber (men tvivler) på at det kan få nogen til at genoverveje deres handlinger, inden de gør noget virkelig dumt, fx denne tragiske historie.
Any first person shooter. I’m just not into something that requires that kind of reflexes and precision, especially with a first person perspective where you can be killed instantly from behind.
I get the complaint, it feels like it could be so tactical and strategic but often you get fucked by bad luck. But that’s kinda rogue likes for you I guess. Wonder if there was a way to design it differently.
A bit sad that this is still relevant 12 years later.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Beep boop test 1 2 3 er vi i live?
EDIT: Umiddelbart ja :D
Wait, what are the credits for? You spend them to watch porn or what? So when you’re out of credits you’re locked out? Sorry but… wtf?
No reputable scientific consensus report indicates we’re all going to die or anything close.
Depends who you are. Middle-class american living not too close to a coast? Yea you’re probably fine, you’ll get hotter summers and colder winters but you’ll survive.
Poor and living nearby to coast or such that can get more easily affected by climate change? You could be pretty fucked by mother nature by chance.
Isn’t this a kind of positive feedback circle though? Right-wing wins, left-wing people move and leave the country, leaving more and more right-wing people left. Then obviously right wing wins again next election, more left-wing people leave and so on and so on.
This can also happen with just people moving from right-wing states to left-wing states. I suspect this is a contributing factor to the increasing split in american politics as people tend to stay where their politics align and leave where it doesn’t.
This doesn’t seem sustainable? Unless the states split into more independent nations that don’t have to align on federal politics.
Ja eller alle bare fik den samme absolutte stigning, det bringer det stadig tættere på hinanden forholdsmæssigt. Tanken med procent er vel at man beholder forholdet mellem de fagenes lønninger men jeg er ikke sikker på at det er ønskværdigt eller den rigtige måde at gøre det på heller.
Ja. I det private ville det løse sig gennem højere lønninger da konkurrencen om medarbejdere bliver højere og højere. Det offentlige er nødt til at gøre det samme hvis du spørger mig. Sæt lønnen markant op så der er noget motivation for at blive/starte i branchen.
That is also possible, but I think it’s more likely to show the actual distribution rather than a bias like that. But sure.
Why not both? 🤪
hvis man i længden ikke får de natlige rejsninger, så får vævet ikke den ilt, det skal have. Det betyder, at vævet over tid kan tage permanent skade, fordi den glatte muskulatur i penis dør og erstattes af bindevæv, der ikke kan bruges til at få rejsning.
Huh, gad vide om dette er en af grundene til at man onanerer, sådan rent evolutionært. Altså for at få en regelmæssig ilt-indskydning i vævet og holde det sundt.
Fået, altså bare sådan helt gratis? Vanvittigt!
/c/de_gjorde_matematikken?
Fatter ikke at folk har råd eller tid til at tage på sådan et krydstogtskib.
Perfectly valid interpretation :)
Det virker lidt paradoksalt at spare på det område og samtidig bede befolkningen om at forberede sig. Minder mig om @[email protected]s kommentar fra nogle uger siden.