• 4 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 3rd, 2025

help-circle





  • But up until recently you could download packages and utilities directly from their site, now you are forced to do it through Microsoft Store. I just started this new Win11 laptop and right after debloating the shit out of it I noticed the updates didn’t install HEIC and AV1 codecs and there was no way for me to install them without getting Microsoft Store back, so I restored it and downloaded them and then removed Microsoft Store… guess what? Removing it removed the downloads as well lol




  • Word (about being practically useless). I have been using it to automate some stuff, like when I’m creating a json I just paste a bunch of data there and ask it to format for me, but I have to do in small batches and constantly correct the way it’s doing… Chat GPT was way better, but I don’t want to use it anymore
    Sometimes I use AI to grammar check me (I’m not a native speaker) if I’m unsure of what I’m writing or I absolutely want to write stuff correctly, I did it a few times in Lumo, but I didn’t use it enough to compare with duck.ai, so I can’t say if it’s better or worse - but I always add “don’t rewrite, just point errors, ignore slurs, ignore slang, ignore informal language, ignore internet lingo” etc etc, and they go and rewrite my sentence changing everything hehe (again, Chat GPT was way better)


  • I’ve read this on GrapheneOS page

    “Avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they’re currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface. Gecko doesn’t have a WebView implementation (GeckoView is not a WebView implementation), so it has to be used alongside the Chromium-based WebView rather than instead of Chromium, which means having the remote attack surface of two separate browser engines instead of only one. Firefox / Gecko also bypass or cripple a fair bit of the upstream and GrapheneOS hardening work for apps. Worst of all, Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android. This is despite the fact that Chromium semantic sandbox layer on Android is implemented via the OS isolatedProcess feature, which is a very easy to use boolean property for app service processes to provide strong isolation with only the ability to communicate with the app running them via the standard service API. Even in the desktop version, Firefox’s sandbox is still substantially weaker (especially on Linux) and lacks full support for isolating sites from each other rather than only containing content as a whole. The sandbox has been gradually improving on the desktop but it isn’t happening for their Android browser yet.” https://grapheneos.org/usage

    And all I use is Gecko-based hehe (although on desktop), I’m currently using Brave just to have some old/disposable accs logged, but I’m looking for Chromium alternatives… and I just looked at ungoogled git and it seems like I have to download a bunch of stuff to compile it myself, argh, I hate that :P






  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.mltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldDo you like systemd?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    From what I heard, people hate systemd because Linus Torvald was approached by the NSA to create a backdoor on Linux, he said it wouldn’t be possible to change the kernel because there were too many eyes on it, there was a mysterious hack of kernel.org introduced a mysterious code but it was spotted and removed… well, what was the only other thing common to all Linux? The sysv-init, but it was too small, too tight, too specific for them to create a backdoor there, they needed something big, bloated, doing way more than it should do, like it was just supposed to start the system but it can also do unrelated stuff like handling DNS, and an American company shows up bringing systemd, that solved all the problems the NSA had to create a backdoor on Linux, and all distros jumped into the honeypot :)


  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlREAD THE TOS! lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    OP just deflecting and ignoring… here’s the deal about privacy:

    If the company doesn’t advertise itself for not saving logs or selling your data: Don’t waste time with the ToS.
    They are saving logs and selling your data.

    If the company advertise itself for not saving logs or selling your data, but it’s American: Don’t waste time with the ToS.
    The government can legally force them into cooperation while placing them under a gag order.

    If the company advertise itself for not saving logs or selling your data and it’s not American: Read the ToS if you want, but it’s not important.
    You will hardly find anything that is not open source recommended for privacy. Read independent code review of the software and third party audits of the company.


  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlREAD THE TOS! lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    “they keep using it thinking it enhances their privacy.”
    Can you give an example of stuff people use because they think it will enhance their privacy but don’t?

    about DuckDuckGo https://duckduckgo.com/privacy
    “We don’t save your IP address or any unique identifiers alongside your searches or visits to our websites. We also never log IP addresses or any unique identifiers to disk.”

    Sure, you can’t trust American companies for shit, same goes for Brave and its ecossystem, so if you can’t trust the ToS content, what’s the point of reading it, duh :P

    If a company doesn’t advertise itself for not saving logs, having no trackers, not using you to train AI, not selling your data, etc, etc, it’s because they are doing all of that, so it’s also pointless to read the ToS… if they say they don’t save logs, etc, then sure, there may be a point reading to see if there are any caveats, but I trust more third party audits (like Proton and Mullvad regularly have) and the code being open source and reviewed independently.


  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.mltoPrivacy@lemmy.mlREAD THE TOS! lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Can you give an example of stuff people use because they think it will enhance their privacy but don’t?
    Because software and services people use because they think it enhances their privacy usually are:

    Proton (mail, VPN, docs, storage)
    Mullvad (browser, VPN, DNS, search engine)
    Tuta, DuckDuckMail, SimpleLogin, addy.io, Mailvelope, Thunderbird
    StartPage, DuckDuckGo, Duck.ai, SearXNG
    LibreWolf, Tor, IronFox, Vanadium
    uBlockOrigin, AdGuard DNS, ControlD, Technitium, Pi-Hole, simplewall, Portmaster
    Debian, Fedora, Arch, GrapheneOS
    Qubes, Whoonix, Tails
    Fediverse instances that explicitly say no tracking/analytics, telemetry/data selling, ads, AI training

    Reading the ToS of any of these revealed they in fact don’t enhance privacy?



  • I use my cellphone only to message relatives and play some MP3s. It’s a Samsung J2 Core I bought in 2019 because it was the cheapest non-second-hand smartphone I could find at the time. Its last security patch was in 2021, and they dropped support. It’s barely compatible with the current Google ecosystem, and I’m probably getting locked out of it anytime now because apps will refuse to work… even LineageOS, which supposedly increases the life of smartphones, doesn’t support it… I’m sad I’m going to have to spend money on one of these sometime soon even though it’s still working.