I’m glad you think your god is incompetent.
Standups are a short (hopefully) meeting usually done in a software development environment that tells the team what everyone was and is working on amd what issues are blocking them (i.e., blockers)
I expect they had some or mostly legitimate clients. Really hard to hide a drug distribution network in the open without legitimate traffic to hide in.
Purebred mutt. 100% good boy.
I mean, they DO site their sources. It’s in the description.
Satan has amassed an impressive list of biblical scholars ready to reveal the “standard stuff” taught in Christian seminaries: Bart Ehrman (UNC Chapel Hill), John J. Collins (Yale), Dale Allison (Princeton Seminary), Susan Niditch (Amherst), Ron Hendel (UC Berkeley), and Hector Avalos (Iowa State). This is established seminary curriculum about biblical history, biblical morals, authorship claims, and early Christianity — a curriculum never shared with the congregation.
They even show clips of those experts reading from well-cited books like Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence or The Apocalyptic Imagination. You can go read those or others of multi-hundred page books shown if you want the definitive evidence, but in this case this wasn’t about “here’s the hard evidence”. Especially since people don’t change their minds if you present evidence like that.
It’s supposed to consolidate information and help people start the process to questioning some things that maybe were once set in stone. Not fully change change minds or be referenced as a resource.
Care to elaborate on how? or what could have been done differently? For a free video on the internet, I’d say it’s pretty good.
My mess up. I didn’t add YTD. So for us right now, pretty much nothing.
But look at where you got the numbers from.
Total CBP Enforcement Actions
Numbers below reflect Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 - FY 2024.
Fiscal Year 2024 runs October 1, 2023 - September 30, 2024.
FY2024YTD is from October 1, 2023 to now, so that doesn’t mean 7 days, it’s more like 3 months.
EDIT: Added YTD because I derped.
You may be remembering the study from almost 10 years ago where a whole bunch of men got injections and some stopped because they got severe acne. Now, that seems like a wimp thing to do. It doesn’t include the fact that some men had wild mood swings with it (doesn’t happen with womens pill), one developed severe depression, and one successfully committed suicide.
I also disagree with the wording from NPR - men didn’t “complain” about the side effects, they REPORTED them. Because they were on a clinical study. And that’s what you do on clinical studies.
The boards overseeing the trial stopped it at that point. The men that stayed in on the trial would have kept going if they could have, even with the side effects. So no - men can and have dealt with the side effects.
“stealthing” is also a thing now. It’s just women claiming to be on the pill to men instead of vice versa. Trust between two people always has to be there, and some people will break that trust to get their parts licked. It’s human nature, not a man vs woman vs NB thing.
Stealthing still going to be a problem with STIs, even with a pill/injection male contraception. Condoms are still going to be necessary.
Probably not. But remember that ~4% of all death row inmates are innocent, so it may be that he didn’t kill anyone.
Also, shouldn’t the state be better than a murderer? Shouldn’t the mere fact that we believe we, as a society, are civilized mandate allowing a death row inmate respect before they die?
I’m not religious, so I don’t think praying and final words will do anything. But it won’t harm anyone, and if it makes him more comfortable as he goes out, especially in light of the likelihood he didn’t that to his victim, I’m not against it.
There have been some news pieces put out, but most importantly
… the Physicians Committee (PCRM) said records it obtained for the 23 monkeys used in the experiments reflect a “pattern of extreme suffering and staff negligence.” The committee said that the letter to the USDA is based on nearly 600 pages of what it calls “disturbing” documents released after the committee filed an initial public records lawsuit in 2021.
Now, CNN did link to Nueralink’s site, but not to PCRM. That, to me, says a lot about who you they’re supporting.
If you want to read PCRMs report, it’s here. Because reading the sources is always a good idea.
Do you have a link to that post? Or more lyrics? Cause the only thing I can get think of would be Fucked with an anchor but it doesn’t match up well at all
Not really. After working with CentOS (RIP) for a half decade, that Firefox version was so out of date I was practically in diapers when it came out. Getting the latest version of Firefox was such a pain that my org didn’t bother even if it would have given us some niceties.
LTS and other “enterprise” distros don’t push the latest version precisely because of dependencies.
Backup cameras, at least in the US, are a legally mandated feature. Cars cannot come without them.
If anyone ever tries to sell you a car based on ‘it has a backup camera!’, be very skeptical of what else they’re trying to upsell you on that’s legally required.
Yes, the problem is production capacity, but it’s very difficult to get that capacity up and running. For example, Intel started building 2 factories in Ohio last year. They won’t be up and running until at least 2025.
This stuff is complicated and nobody predicted the rise of covid, crypto currencies, or AI, or if they did nobody was convinced enough to dedicate potential billions of dollars to building capacity to capitalize on it.
Don’t know why this is getting down voted. Seems like some good examples of why Russia and it’s troops are bastards, to Ukraine and their own people.
This isn’t about critical race theory. This is about how high schoolers are taking formalized debates about one topic and turning them to talk about something very different, e.g. From ‘should the US implement carbon tax’ to ‘we need to burn down capitalism because it’s the reason we need the carbon tax in the first place’.
i mean, 5 to 10 megabyte (40-80 Mbps) is better definitely. 25 Mbps is absolutely terrible for my partner and I if they’re watching a show and I’m trying to game.
Why would they spell out that sort of requirement? You are assuming they are operating in the open, in good faith.
They have a history of doing this sort of thing.
I don’t think the IMF or anybody should be screwing over borrowers but at least it’s in the open where you and I, the concerned public, can do something.