That’s not how that works.

NFT is issued determining ownership to a property. Property sells, another NFT is issued, tied to the original one to maintain a chain of ownership. Issuance of a second NFT for a sale to a new owner would depend on authorization by the previous NFT holder. Lienholder information could also be stored, and linked to a mortgage NFT with payment history.

The “NF” part of that stands for “non-fungible.” As in, once created, cannot be changed.

One of the things blockchain could do is become a digital proof of ownership, augmenting or replacing things like property deeds and car titles. We already agree that a written record of ownership of such things is legally binding (even if the writing is stored digitally), but transfer of that ownership to another person is still a very manual process. Imagine an NFT that represents ownership of your house, and when you want to sell your house, you transfer that NFT to someone else’s custody - adding their ownership information to it. It would record the entire chain of ownership, and specific details about the piece of property involved.

Magnavox Odyssey

Using computers and also having to deal with their problems is still far more betterer than not using computers at all.

I’ve been to Dallas, and I’ve been to San Antonio, but I have not been to Houston.

Authority, story, escalatory — I think you might be a rapper.

Edit: I also just noticed the pairing of ‘fascist’ and ‘nationalistic’ which I like very much.

Let me see what I can do.

A “debtor” is a company or person who owes money. I would assume that by “corporation,” they mean “the ‘corporation’ which is both you and not you.” So let’s call that “Someone who owes money.”

A “creditor” is a company or person to whom money is owed.

I believe that “individual agent” is referring back to the “person,” while the “straw man” is the imaginary magical –

You know, fuck it, I can’t even.

It’s possible that the Ark could have generated enough static electricity to give you a shock on the order of rubbing your feet on the carpet and then touching a door knob. Maybe.

For the passers-by, in very simple terms:

A switch maintains a list of the IPs and MAC addresses of devices attached to it (ARP [Address Resolution Protocol] table). When a packet comes into the switch for a specific destination IP, the switch looks up on the ARP table where that destination IP can be found, and only sends the packet out on the port the destination device (or next hop towards that device) is connected to.

A hub doesn’t do any of that. Every packet that comes into the hub gets sent out of every port on the hub, to every device connected to the hub. It’s on the connected devices’ to discard packets that aren’t addressed to them. On anything but a very small and relatively slow network, this would create an unnecessarily large amount of traffic, not to mention the security issue around sending packets to devices they’re not addressed to.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47627/could-the-ark-of-the-covenant-have-killed-by-acting-as-a-capacitor

If your use case is “pretty simple,” you’re unlikely to have problems with any operating system.

How much time do we waste on car problems? Neighbor problems? Political problems? Grocery problems?

This is why we have zoning laws, folks.

I’d intercept me.

I watch a lot of car revival channels, and my favorite is Sleeperdude, because it’s the whole family working together to do it, and that’s definitely a big part of the charm of the show.

Also Josh is really good at what he does.

No, it’s responding to your comment suggesting something different by giving you something different. It has no idea what’s correct or incorrect. You do, so when you give it input that you know is more correct, of course it’s going to respond by telling you you’re right.

Try feeding it incorrect answers as though they are correct and see what happens.

BRB sending this link to Nana.

It’s also possible to have Windows log in as a specific user at boot, without user input. Regardless of operating system, your logged on session is in the context of some user account, whether you interactively log in or the system does it for you.

The PIN is stored locally on the machine only. It doesn’t get synced with anything anywhere. It’s actually much safer to use a PIN for authentication because it’s four digits that you (well, maybe not you) don’t have to write down, and the only time it works is on the physical machine. The user account password can be long and/or complex, but if you’re only ever authenticating at the keyboard, all you have to remember is the PIN.

Now that’s etiquette.