LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]

Kamala harris wanted to “rebuild” the u.s. military into “the world’s deadliest” and said Iran was America’s #1 enemy. What the fuck do you think her intentions are with those statements, you absolute fucking imbecile? Or were you too stupid and ignorant to actually pay attention to the things she said during her 5 minutes of campaigning, so you don’t actually know what the fuck you’re talking about?

the Republican party

Quick, chat, what did the democrats have to say about the u.s. military or Iran during the last election? Oh, Kamala Harris was literally even more bellicose?? yup those dang Republicans alright

Weird, for a country that’s awful to live in China surrrre beats the shit out of literally any western country when it comes to the approval of the population. Are you sure you’re not just a pig stupid ignorant cracker who’s been lied to?

knowing how the sausage is made."

I’ll still eat that slop

Your screen is 360 by 640 pixels, rendered at 4x density — which means it is almost certainly a recent, high-end display

GUESS AGAIN, IDIOTS!

well, nobody says shit about you, you’re cool

every battle is a personal battle in a way, even a real battle, like, personally i wouldn’t be there

Im cool but i’m not so cool i can ignore hushed whispers of “that’s the guy… yea, brings his own tp, yea, weird shit”

Every “oh yeah just poop on company time” motherfucker just casually bragging about their platinum laced anus that can withstand being sandpapered to death by the world’s cheapest toilet paper (which should be banned btw)

p.s.

Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.

• Albert Einstein, Why Socialism?

but no again tell me about how the level of political freedom you have differs meaningfully between western societies and China

china gets shit on because they don’t have political freedom; there’s no stuff like “you can speak your mind as long as you’re respectful”. it’s just one committee making all the decisions and you can go to jail for disagreeing.

what if actually it’s more like you need to know what the fuck you’re talking about in order to Be Political (which involves joining the party and by its nature excludes capitalist roaders and compradors attempting to bring back capitalist systems) and then democracy happens within that party

instead of like a big nameless Committee made up of a hivemind AI like intelligence that just Dictates

maybe that’d be better than having two bourgeois parties (or dozens of bourgeois parties in Europe/etc) owned by bourgeois interests effectively negating the existence of democracy by ensuring that all “democratic” institutions, by consequence of bourgeois influence over parties, operate at their pleasure

3 June 1989 I’m China

on, tinyman square, lol

it’s funny how the image of tanks crushing people is more solidified in the minds of westerners than what happened, which there is video proof of, which is none of that and also the tanks leaving

issues with the Chinese government

name one

Pro tip but billionaires don’t need to own things

I wish there was a way to litigate bans made by corporate media because I just got a twitter account banned for being fucking fake or some shit and i appealed it and they were like, lol, no. No further appeals. Literally not a thing i can do. And it’s kinda galling when i get DMs from obvious bots 10000x a day and they do NOTHING against those, despite them being so very obviously fake. And here I am being told IM the fake one and I don’t even deserve to look at thirsty shit and jerk off because of it??

Are you saying it’s not possible to nationalize a foreign company when that’s literally why iran exists today as an Islamic republic (attempting to nationalize the AIOC, now British petroleum)

Nationalizing tech shit is even easier because intellectual property is fake bullshit and there’s no need to possess physical infrastructure

I would say just nationalize it but tbh it sucks, between reddit and twitter im surprised there aren’t enough bot accounts to cause some sort of digital singularity and not the kind the nerds want

Edit: the X part made me think you were talking about twitter

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

They also have names and addresses but unfortunately people are still in the “protest! Mill about and get brutalized by police for no tactical or strategic gains” state of mind