Kumikommunism [they/them]

As opposed to the Democrats’ very peaceful mass slaughter of innocent Arab children.

Private vehicles are by far the greatest share of transport-related CO2 emissions, more than double road-based freight . You can just easily look this up.

And the proof of that is what, exactly?

I think there are also other levers that could be pulled to help

Yes, and I’m sure we can count on Starmer to block those too.

You seem to be a Starmer fan who goes around denying that he’s just another right wing ghoul. So I don’t think your real problem is the website. I think you just don’t want this to be true. So to address that directly (the actual point you’re trying to make, not the one you made up), here’s a news link saying the same thing: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/government-no-plans-whatsoever-sadiq-141519860.html

Surely you won’t just ignore this.

The one country that is escalating things is Russia.

This war is literally only happening because of the US and the other countries in NATO. Don’t think you should be writing such pithy statements if your understanding of the war is equivalent to a Star Wars plotline.

Ooh, thanks for the GlazeWM shout, that’s awesome. I use vim keybinds in as many programs as I can and that is awesome for switching between the browser and terminal or text editor.

If it’s on YouTube, then Sponsorblock will work on it as well. (Given someone has marked the sections, which is almost always)

Vimium-C is a rewrite and is better, and more well-documented.

https://github.com/gdh1995/vimium-c

Sure, Muslims are being slaughtered every day, children are being shot in the head while walking down the street, hospitals are basically halfway to being morgues, but how could you possibly hold anyone to higher standards?!?!

Expecting someone to be anti-genocide is way too far!

Well, you are correct, in a way. The Harris/Walz ticket has a very large chance to commit genocide if elected. That’s something that Claudia & Karina have zero chance of doing.

You should be proud!

The citations and author for several of them are right there in the image. Are you visually impaired? Again, I must ask, is it simply the content that you disagree with, but you don’t have any actual arguments against it? That’s what this seems like to me.

Well, I’m curious which ones you tried finding any information on, and which ones were difficult for you? The one that is an attributed quote is especially easy to find. The one with the exact title of a news article is also very easy to find. And one is a reference to a widely publicized act he took in office during a series of nationwide protests about which many news articles are incredible easy to find with keywords. The last one is also very easy to find with keywords.

You’re implying some of it is not true, I think. So what did you do to verify them, and which ones were you unable to? Surely you aren’t just pretending to care about misinformation but not putting any effort into verification yourself, right? Does that only go for facts you already like?

The text is quite readable and this seems to be an attention-grabbing poster with some visuals. What’s wrong with the text?

Or is it perhaps the content that you have a problem with?

Genociders gonna genocide. I really would love to see all the snarky liberals like you try and give your snide remarks in front of a Palestinian whose child was blown to pieces or who lost all their limb function from being shot while walking down the street.

I’m quite sure you are not brave enough.

I found a citation for every single one of these easily. Which one are you struggling to verify?

Surely, you…you know…did some work to verify your beliefs instead of sticking your head in the sand…right?

No, he’s pro-Israel. But talks about it in weird liberation language that is common to Zionists in “progressive” circles. Very sinister.

And the people the Dems are trying to pull in with this move are not those with enough conviction to actually care about Palestine. He is just someone who has a few middling “progressive achievements” that libs can point to as a defence against the truth that Kamala isn’t really that progressive.

Uh, nice attempted topic change there. Guess you are just going to ignore that the Democrats are even more anti-immigrant than Trump is because it doesn’t fit your narrative.

I can’t believe you’re bragging about the Republicans not pushing an anti-immigrant bill. Truly sick stuff for someone who was pretending to care about racism from Republicans.

Biden and Harris have both promised and delivered on being more racist than Trump, who is already incredibly racist. You don’t dislike racism. You dislike it when Red Team does it.

If you pay absolutely no attention to policies or what is actually going on, I could see how you would reach that conclusion. Reality, unfortunately, disagrees with you.

https://www.npr.org/2024/07/30/nx-s1-5055670/harris-trump-border-immigration-georgia

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/MIGRATION-DEPORTATIONS/](https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/MIGRATION-DEPORTATIONS/akpeoeoerpr/

https://apnews.com/article/biden-asylum-ban-halt-border-mexico-1905e3565b2da1cffb8f38a778c07118

Why would they vote for Harris, who has already stated her desire to support Israel’s genocide and ethnostate? How long before her racist leadership tries to outright deport all Muslim citizens for being “too anti-semitic”?