LOL the comments telling the Verge to shut it’s mouth.

Also man France loves piracy. I apparently need to learn French better.

Wow that’s a new one… I knew the eating spiders was a myth I just didn’t realize they preferred the other end.

What a privileged take of an author thinking that’s the base level of suffering of a person they don’t know.

I understand that I’m not the intended audience since I can’t afford to have my broken tooth fixed but than maybe the author should have left this as an audience of just themselves.

What a twat.

Same way in the infinite random non repeating numbers of Pi is the binary of a 4k resolution photo of Betty White nude holding a snake on a tiger.

It’s random forever and eventually the 1s and 0s fall into place. The problem is the monkeys repeating themselves.

A representative example is not the whole beginning and end of a definition my dude/ette.

They did mark ownership. Their prisoners. They marked them to show they are in ownership of the IDF and used numbers to easier organize. It’s a thing that’s pretty basic just not usually done on skin which is why people are upset and trying to cover for this.

My grandmother was an ilenglush teacher and would be really upset if you were in her class.

You get a C- for definitions and reading comprehension. Class dismissed.

Harder to draw quickly, gotta have them pre printed and then there is the ink costs and where on earth could Israel get the money for that?

A printed mark to designate ownership.

Wrote numbers on their forehead to dehumanize them.

Nope. Not even touching the comparison to concentration camps cause it doesn’t matter. They were branded. You not liking the word cause of your own connotations does not make it incorrect.

Its an example of. It was tagged as see also. And it’s literally says “printed” what the hell.

I’m sorry I left in the direct dictionary text so it can be nitpicked as to how writing numbers on people isn’t “branding”

How is there this many people that can argue against a dictionary?

Haha yeah sorry… I spent to much time in some backwater places in the south and Midwest parts of America and heard it a whole lot.
Heard it used for other things too… But one use stood out above the rest in my memories.

Yeah that one is a bit funny. Autocorrect can be a bitch. Doesn’t explain you demanding a different word because it has a definition you don’t like and ignoring it.

Brand

1): a mark made by burning with a hot iron to attest manufacture or quality or to designate ownership

(2): a printed mark made for similar purposes :

It mentions a printed mark. Read a dictionary next time you are board bored and want to defend the IDF.

Edit: God I hate modern autocorrect and IDF bought people being wrong while pedantic

Sure.

That’s why you gleefully announced you were blocking a person to close in your echo chamber more to ignore reality and why you refuse to look up the definition of brand and use a specific version that you want so you can claim it as wrong?

1): a mark made by burning with a hot iron to attest manufacture or quality or to designate ownership (2): a printed mark made for similar purposes : trademark

Cause printed would cover using a marker or tattoo on someone’s body. Literally.

Or are you just upset people are upset at this and want to excuse it so that people are less so? If you have no fight in this leave and don’t respond to people here anymore. You are off topic and bad at vocabulary anyways and it’s distracting.

Mine was “darker than a black cat in a coal mine at night” but I think it’s just easier for hicks with an accent to say. Far less racist than the other ways they would say “dark”.

Wow, what strong resolve you have for your side.

And you have to be a jerk apparently.

I am importing mine into a photo editor so might be something with that. Anyways.

Thanks for the examples. It gave me something to think about and the discussion has been interesting. I think there may be details to take away from this but I’m not in a rush to dip back into AI images.

deleted by creator

When I look at the HSL of those colors I get 60, 54 and 46 (ignoring the ocean one cause I just don’t have that open anymore) for the S (saturation) value.

Like I said it’s weird that we are getting different values cause your brightness also wasn’t in line with what I had. And that wouldn’t be a screen issue.

My red came in at 73% for me.

Ehhh you’d be surprised how much small highlights and true dark values will skew an average. You don’t really get blown out or completely under exposed parts of AI generated images. It keeps trying to add some saturation.

I will say I’m getting different brightness levels than you are but it’s not a big deal. Point made.

However I will say saturation is also pretty much 50% across the board for all the colors so maybe there is something there to use as an indicator. The average color always comes out grey toned somehow.

Testing it myself has been pretty spot on.

Just to point it out, here is a photo I took to mimic the red man. And the color average from it.

It doesn’t even have the highlights of the face and yet it’s already much brighter and has a much higher saturation.

You immediately assumed people needed to have multiple pieces of hardware when some can’t even afford past what their job provides, being able to have a separate and dedicated machine is still privileged.

You got immediately defensive and felt you had to rush to defend the dangerous question because you thought I might have been snarky when asking? What the hell?!

And you are still doing it!