Nor are cells in a womb. Sorta the point,

Cells react to things. Dose not mean it is an independent console being.

If you can proove your cancer moles meet the same standards. Would you still agree with removal.

Old English vs modern. Original meaning was to alter something.

As our political system grew from royal land allocation where Lords were in control of the laws of their own serfs.

Surgeries were how locals talked with Lords abouts altering contracts and management of the land laws etc. More like a court then a town hall.

As we moved to a democratic system and the house of commons gained power. MP took over the job / terms.

In old UK English surgery had 2 meanings.

The common medical one. And a general alteration.

This means MPs and parliment have applied the term to the time our representatives spend gaining input from voters in theiir constituancy. As before commons became powerful it was more a lords of the manner position.

At the time when the position was more royal. IE lords and land owners. It allowed the lords to hear requests for alterations on how they managed the constituancy.

Now its more about a meeting where MPs hear from indevidual voters about issues they can help with.

It’s a first. Bizarre=scummy attempt to avoid responsibility

Pretty sure it’s a case of he found a loophole that allows him to avoid claiming his own fiscal status, using the independence of the company to avoid claiming personnel donations as party donations.

But that’s just a guess based on him being a smug toad in general.

EDIT: Also, that likely only worked until he became an MP. As an actual representative, the separation would be non-advantageous. What with acts in parliment being covered by parliamentary procedure, not legal jurisdiction.

I find it hard to imagine him looking any other way.

If it looks like etc.

Except starmer hasent.

He came forward on his own recognisance in the one occation he relised he had. And reported it to parliment.

The rest of the gifts were all reported and are entirly within the rules.

Cool. Your welcome to feel that way.

But when you intimidate people who disagree with your flawed non scientific ideal of the start of life.

You face restrictions on you right to gather near them.

I will add as a narrowboater.

I found towpaths also have this issue with definition of surface.

I am legally blind. (Some vision but bad)

I have a few times tried to add more ditail to areas of towpath that will help the others like me know what to expect before mooring.

Seems anything that improves this will help in your issues as well.

In no way related to this thread.

As opposed to controlling a mammals desire to breed?

It not like either solution is easier.

My point was more about your attitude towards parental leave.

But it is not actually a dact thar trhe earth is over populated. How we live is more an issue then the numbers.

Any science on the autual numbers earth can support leaves us with a few bln to go.

But that science doselt allow for capatalism.

Nah. They have Ring doorbell, to spy on the nuddy bikers instead.

s/" attacks on working from home were “/”"

This. It is like any tool. It is down to the skill/knowlege/experience of the user to evaluate the result.

But as soon as management/government start seeing it as a cheat to reduce hiring. It become a danger.

Won’t make you feel any better.

But lasers on a drone as a weapon is not yet very practice. Drone would need to be huge. And bullets are just better for the weight.

Atm, closest we are likely to get is blue whales with lasers on the head.

kissing the corporate boot

See that’s where you are going wrong. Who the hell wants their BOOTs kissed.

Learn from generations of Britt’s. Tug your forelocks and get the lords to bend over and spread.

Your logic is flawed. Even if we reduced births to 10% of current rates. Those children would need more parental support for longer. As that generation would be more dependent on parental and family bonding due to lack of a same aged community to learn and grow with.

We are a species evolved to have very, very dependent young, rather than most other mammals. This presented up with advantages in the predator / prey fight that is evolution. But it also left our young depended on tribal societies to survive.

Parental leave is just the modern capitalistic equivalent of the tribe coming together to raise its young. It is the recent historic lack of it in many societies and post-industrial revolution that is odd. Not the return.

You as a non parent will eventually need these children to learn to manage the society you live in. Just because you choose to be child free yourself. Does not mean you will not depend on them as adults as you age. As you age you will need educated doctors nurses and Bin men to ensure your life is liveable. Those adults are the very children you think are not your responsibility now.

But unless you are a hermit living entirely on the milk of your own land. (if so you are already not funding this).

Then yes, you and all of us are involved in raising the future population.

Np

Not really. While the green party is left of labour. Its green credentials are pretty poor. Nimbyism has made them choose some rather odd positions.

This is an issue as it is a one issue named party. So like labour making odd non worker beneficial policies harms labour among left wing. Those nimby votes harm green reputation among green.

And while the 2 Green and left are not really related. They have a freaking huge crossover on a venn diagram. So both are rejected by a large % of the left.