Yep, by definition generative AI gets worse the more specific you get. If you need common templates though, it’s almost as good as today’s google.
Yep, by definition generative AI gets worse the more specific you get. If you need common templates though, it’s almost as good as today’s google.
The headline should specify Korea. I mean, I know it was too good to be true I guess.
Wow, I did NOT expect that story after seeing the picture. Doesn’t seem related.
Would I curse in his name or praise him if I misspell something?
“Amazon.
We’re evil, and we like it!”
Honestly, it’s one of the more mask off of all the big companies.
Here comes the queen with a 200 space jump to the living room, looking for a possible flank…
What surprises me is that they (people in the past) didn’t have past examples about similar things happening with very bad consequences, we do.
You would think the knowledge would make a difference…
We should put public roads in our city.
Why, so people can just trespass everywhere?
Yea, but we have many different flavours of socialism, the last one is solar punk and it’s rad!
Belong to China
Wait, don’t you mean, a part of China?
Cities and counties aren’t property…right?
Yep. I mean, Harper was shit too and also did not legalize weed.
This is a pretty common challenge in philosophy with a very obvious solution:
Define the controversial word (or words) at the top. It’s done all the time in science articles or legal documents.
You can even compound it to point out it’s your version (like calling it Lefty-woke).
By avoiding it, imo, you let them win and “claim” the word, since in their worldview, everyone is now using it like them.
Having said that, this is just my approach, I think the issue with politics is that people assume everyone is using the same language. You got to affirm or confirm that first.
Also, ironically, I think we are talking about the same thing, just using different words lol.
How can we reach understanding when we don’t even agree on the definition of words?
I actually think this is the reason why there is so much polarization, we are literally talking different languages.
I’m not saying both sides are the same, the opposite actually, one side is willing to use standardized definitions or just use new ones specific to the discussion/debate.
The other side realized they can make people believe in a fascist fantasy by changing the meaning and more importantly, the emotional response behind the meaning.
And it’s not new, this is what it always comes down to. I argue for socialism because I am arguing for cooperating and equal ownership, others argue against it because they (for whatever fucking reason) hear tyranny cause you know, regulations means less freedom.
We already have a word for that, it’s called tribalism.
I actually have more respect for her now than in 2016, and it’s not cause of this headline.
She honestly stayed out of things waaay more than I thought, still a shitty person but better than ivanka.
Pick a lane!
Why? I don’t think she ever wanted to be in the spotlight and having to pick a lane; she is pretty close for Donny hitting the bucket and her finally getting a slice of the grift pie.
Dude, you can’t end it in such a rad way and expect us to despise the prompt input guy.
Is it weird that I have prime but I pirate still?
It’s just not a good experience…
Woke is interestingly becoming a word that can easily trigger and be used to troll conservatives.
My favourite thing is asking them to define woke.
Nice, comes with free ghosts too!