Fulifilling your dreams is all about the power of persistence folks! That, and having a friend willing to invest almost $70M in your dream.
Fulifilling your dreams is all about the power of persistence folks! That, and having a friend willing to invest almost $70M in your dream.
But isn’t chocolate toxic to cats? You win some, you lose some.
So the caption is really: “man convinces 5 clearly less enthusiastic friends to play board game.”
“Thank you, but we follow Martian facts here, we aren’t interested in your Venusian ways.”
I vote the 7 August should hereafter be declared “Succulent Chinese Meal Day” in tribute.
Gotta chase that sweet, sweet live service money though.
But earlier this month, he said he would move the company’s headquarters to Austin, citing a new Golden State law meant to protect LGBTQ+ children as the “final straw.”
Imagine being so full of hate for a highly vulnerable group of people that you base your business decisions around it.
The bananas won’t be fooled, because everyone knows that bananas are straight until they get picked and the banana bender puts the bend in them.
It’s not really a debate about continuing to rely on fossil fuels. For context, in Australia the conservative coalition (for some reason) has an idealogical bee in its bonnet about investing more heavily in renewable energy sources, instead arguing that nuclear energy production is the way of the future.
I thought it must be too garbled for someone to have honestly thought it was a sensible message, but hadn’t seen it before. Thanks for the extra context.
The thought of seeing someone shouting “Train!” still gives me nostalgia.
It looks like something “sci fi” from a 90s video game, when low-res polygon models were the best computers could do.
Including humans. I’m not going near the person launching pinecones at my head from their yard.
But quoting it implies it’s an invalid claim.
Interesting. I read the quotes as meaning: someone else said it, it’s not just some opinion we made up. In this case, it was reporting the coroner’s official finding.
In other words, I understood it to be reinforcing the claim rather than invalidating it.
Why are we quoting each other? I remember the comment before yours. I made it. Idiot.
Because quoting in a response provides structure to the response that improves readability.
Also, you are posting on a publicly accessible forum, not having a one-on-one conversation. In that context, that fact that you may remember what you said doesn’t mean that it’s not beneficial to repeat it for others.
The “idiot” comment was unnecessarily rude where someone was engaging in what appeared to be a good faith response, and only brings down the tone of your entire post.
Why so often? I just updated my almost 10 year old PC that had one gpu upgrade in its life, and was still happily playing the 10 year old games I wanted to play.
Then I got the new PC with decent specs and decided to push its limits with some Stardew Valley.
It’s Australia. Everything tries to kill you.
Possibly he knows that, and is just trying to bleed his supporters for donations until the last moment.
The article has a paragraph later on that says:
In rejecting the plaintiffs’ claims for damages, the court said, “It cannot be said that discussions at the Diet…regarding provisions not allowing same-sex marriage are clearly in violation of the Constitution.”
I suspect the plaintiffs are only appealing that aspect of the judgment.
Wrong place to leave a habitat for bugs.