Not to fet credible, but from a treeline 2km away a properly disguised tank can be pretty stealthy. Same concept of stealth aircraft, yeah if its close you’re gonna see it, but if passive and active sensors can pick it up till visual range, well mighty fine way to sneak a platoon of tanks into an otherwise ‘observed’ area while looking like little more than a couple of civilian vehicles or migrating animals to a radar, or dull spot to thermals.

I wanna spend some time cuddled up in bed with horror books and horror movies…

Take your upvote and get out.

Making a console exclusive on their worst selling console ever was probably not helping.

I demand flaccid dildo swords that get erect for special moves

Whoops Dad accidentally recorded over our bootleg copy of land before time with porn :)

Double live is very bad and the cord becomes a literal short. If you’re lucky a breaker will flip or fuse burn out. If you’re not so lucky you have a cable thats either going to start a fire burning its insulation off and melting itself, or potentially exploding depending on quality and type of cable.

On the one hand, there are legitimate uses for double ended male cords. On the other, absolutely none of those legit uses invovle christmas lights

Minnesota here, our kids go back next week.

Sadly SUV and oversized trucks are all too common here. And universally the worst drivers on the road. Gotta love when a tank stops in the crosswalk and honks at you like you’re the asshole for walking infront of them. What I wouldn’t give to force all those idiots to trade out for smart cars, the roads around here would be a lot safer.

Also most people who want to drive EVs want to do so as a cost saving measure. ICEs can go for 25K where I haven’t see an EV in my local area go for less than 40k.

I would love an EV but can’t find anything in my price range, even used ones that optimistically get 70 miles per charge cost more than what a new ICE would cost. I can’t even make a round trip to my parents and back on that.

Back in mar-may it was. Then it was getting 300k users daily with 450k peak players. Now it gets under 30k daily users and ranked 45 on daily players according to steamdb

Sony did a good job of killing PC players tolerance of their bullshit with the helldiver controversy.

Sounds like by his own grading scale he is a dismal failure not worth what his title gets paid.

A minority would assure you that is not weird.

If the Russian bear thought the pig was hard to push around, hes really not gonna like it when the weasel bares it’s fangs.

If Nuclear was 50%-100% more expensive you might have a point.

But it’s not. It’s barely more than 10-20% on the most pessimistic charts over lifetime. Civilization can afford nuclear and can’t afford to ignore it. And Nuclear price tag only goes down as it benefits from economy of scale, the only thing really hindering it. It doesn’t take 30 years to build a reactor, it takes 5-10 depending on bureaucracy people using protest or legal measure to delay it. The time it takes to build a 1,000mW reactor is roughly the same amount of time it’s going to build 1,000mW of Wind or Solar production anyways. So to get back to the point: What exactly is yours?

That’s wrong, nuclear doesn’t equal zero CO2, not even close.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Carbon-footprints-of-various-energy-sources-based-on-32-for-all-energy-sources-other_fig1_308114828

https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-per-energy-source

When accounting for construction, lifetime production, decommission and disposal per mwh produced for all energy sources, nuclear still takes the lead. And it further pulls ahead when you compared land useage per mwh produced per square meter. The only place where Nuclear doesn’t have a cutting edge advantage is cost per kwh, and frankly if you’re putting profits over sustainability then welcome to being part of the problem that lead to us burning coal cause it was cheap.

The best possible solution for a sustainable future is baseline nuclear power to cover average usage of loads, rooftop solar on existing buildings to make use of surface area not otherwise being used for something useful, and wind turbines added to areas where wind production is viable without displacing other production needs, such as adding it to agriculture fields or low impact areas. This ideal circumstance would also have people abandoning low density housing (specifically suburban single family homes) to move to more high density housing (apartments or multiplex homes that host multiple families) to allow additional land to be set aside for ecological restoration to better balance and preserve what climate we still have and enhance carbon capture. This is obviously a goldilocks solution that will never happen because humans will be humans, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be encouraging it and taking steps to emulate it as realistically as possible.

Blizzard today is not the company we knew 15 years ago. They have been so thoroughly corrupted by the corporate ownership they can’t possibly understand what their core audience wants or needs to stay engaged.

Pretty, wish my apartment looked like this. On the flip side, couple dozen wind turbines on the horizon out my bedroom window