I’m not Republican.

deleted by creator

You’re welcome, glad you could put more words in my mouth.

Right!

Except the kid is across the world, and we don’t know them very well. Last we heard, they were one of the worst children in the world. Instead of asking the neighbors to pool money to build a boat to go save this kid, you go to all your neighbors and steal that money.

Fuckin’ a logic.

Not wanting to fund a war doesn’t mean they hate Ukraine or it’s citizens.

The US has agreements to defend their allies. Ukraine isn’t an ally.

Source?

You bring up an excellent point. America doesn’t have to provide further support, because they aren’t single handedly funding Ukraine.

https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/

Not everyone who disagrees with war or your position on it is deep throating Putin.

You have no idea what Putin’s goal is so don’t pretend as if you have some deep insight. The EU can fund its own wars.

The EU can fund its own wars?

Ukraine should fight back. Americans shouldn’t fund war. See how easy this is?

Sound about right. No need to fund this slaughter.

Trails court does. You obviously didn’t read the ruling. We have nothing to discuss.

The Constitution bestows the power upon the presidential office onto the president. Not SCOTUS.

Does it? I see one example that isn’t violent.

Incorrect. Breaking the law is never an official act of the office, and therefore, cannot be protected.

I wonder, what do you think the ruling changed? What can the president do now that the president wasn’t able to do before?

Yes, because it doesn’t fall within the powers granted to the president via the constitution. He cannot sexually harass her. He cannot kill her. He cannot take bribes from her. So on and so forth.

Funny how as soon as Democrats think they have some unlimited magic power all they can come up with is killing their political rivals.