No physical mechanisms predefines future events (or is there one ?).
So, I could state that the future does not exist yet and the past as ceased to exist.
in that statement I have a problem with the definition of existence. Does the definition of existence exist itself ? This is (is it ?) more a problem of terminology than philosophy or physics.
Bonne fête Camus !
(si toutefois vous êtes grand-père. Sinon, bonne fête à un grand-père de votre choix 😋)
Votre imagination est juste car je n’étais pas au courant.
Last i bought was $1.71 CAD / kg
(made in Canada www.italpasta.com )
@anotherlemmyuser 's is $1.06 us$ / 750g so … $1.41 us$ / kg … , so … $1.90 CAD / kg
The price has I’ve got in Canada, is about 10% lower than that one in Malaysia.
Humanity is so stupid when it comes to “territory” and we are not the only species that acts like beasts about it.
I believe in this community you have to write the word “rule” in the title, like so :
Banana? Banana rules !
(you can edit the title even after posting, that is, if you want so)
You can start where ever you want :
(Please excuse this joke : I could not resist)
Those black holes allow the Penrose process which is somewhat similar to what I am talking about here.
I often think about this in the shower
P.S. : Also, i just read the rules and I believe I follow them
The original Big Bang also violates conservation of energy.
For the moment this is just a shower thought. More work would have to be done along these lines.
Those mostly create magnetic and electomagnetic radiation. Some are also magnetars
There is already a link in my post for one big source of gravitational waves
Thanks 😊. This comes from a discussion at [email protected]
… from this discussion thread
Cosmological Microwave Background
This comes from this discussion thread
Thanks for explaining in simple words things that are out of my reach.
I couldn’t understand the first equation in that article (which has 148 equations) : Hamiltonian formulation of gravity as a spontaneously-broken gauge theory of the Lorentz group by Tom Zlosnik.
I read through the blog post you linked from Dr. Pavel Kroupa, The Dark Matter Crisis which is more easy to understand.
From that blog I get that an explanation of the cosmos without the Big Bang is far from the main focus now.
Before writing to you, I was already convinced MOND is superior to LCDM and this for the same reasons you give in your comments and some more.
I hope in the next decades we will see consistent cosmology theories not only without dark matter but also without a big bang.
P.S. : You might like this :
A non-Standard model, David Merritt, Aeon Magazine, July 2021
Could MOND (or RMOND) allow the description of the cosmos without any big bang ?
I do not work in this field but I read quite a bit and I’m interested.
I found these :
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/363102788709576636/
…
Amazon.com: Bellzi Triceratops Cute Stuffed Animal Plush Toy - Adorable …
pinterest.com
…
https://www.thedinopark.com/store/p1089/Seri_the_Triceratops_Plush_-_Bellzi.html
…
Triceratops - Bellzi Seri Plush
thedinopark.com
using image search : blue triceratops plush
Also, a lot of ashes falling everywhere makes everything look grey.
Yes lol well, this is my hobby.
I find radio and TV mostly boring.
Here we have many nice people, liberty of speech and very low social pressure.
Lemmy is Fun 😄
Anthropologically speaking this is the best answer. Our brain needs a certain span of time to establish perceived reality.