cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510
The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker.
A 21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.
Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing.
Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public.
Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.
The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.
I want this entire DOJ arrested and the CIA and FBI dismantled and replaced with a transparent agency that is beholden to America and the constitution. Anyone who worked with Mossad should be tried for treason
Why are they allowed to take stuff down? We need the remaining files still and they’re allowed to take shit down?
They’re allowed because who’s going to stop them?
They’re not allowed by law - they’re allowed simply by being in control of who enforces the law. This kind of government corruption would normally be investigated by the DOJ… Except it’s the DOJ doing it, and the only people who might be able to anything about that (the legislature and judiciary) are complicit.
Half of America needs to go to Washington and demand arrests
Is there anyone from this administration that doesn’t deserve to end up mulched and chummed?
Who wrote this shit, “…Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens…” so a teenager or child and not a woman then?
US media keeps calling the children in the Epstein files women for some reason. It’s been an ongoing theme. German speaking media will occasionally use the German word for minor, but they often also just lazily translate from US sources and use the German word for women/woman.
“some reason” is actively on purpose to change the public perception
It’s because they’re (largely) currently adults, so they’re mixing present and past rhetoric to muddy the waters and confuse people into picturing an adult early teen somehow
It’s called sane washing. The US media is owned by people who are likely in the files too.
mOsT tRanSpaReNt PreSiDeNt EvEr
Welcome to fascism. Just couldn’t vote for Harris? You did this.
I too prefer the puppet on the left.
But Harris didn’t say she was going to solve all the world’s problems immediately! She wanted to personally murder every single Palestinian person. Or something.
She had a funny laugh.
But realistically she had a vagina and voters aren’t super fond of that. If she’d have been a man, she’d have won. I’ll get downvoted and accused of being misogynist but it’s voters who are, especially women.
And now she’s running again and god help us if the party makes the same mistake in 2028, if we have real elections.
Yea, your take is absolutely not realistic in the slightest.
She lost because she was a genocide enabling, corporatist pig who tried to demand votes from people that she refused to represent the interests of.
Her being a woman had nothing to do with why she lost. The only people who gave a shit about that were Republicans and they were never going to flip sides to begin with regardless of how much the Democrats try to capitulate to them.
She lost because she was a genocide enabling, corporatist pig who tried to demand votes from people that she refused to represent the interests of.
Because Trump was certainly none of those things. He totally represented working class people, immigrants, and world peace. There is obviously nothing that Trump has done past and present that would suggest otherwise.
The only difference between him and Kamala is… What again? Sorry, I’m having a hard time finding anything different between the two of them other than their genitals.
She 100% lost because she is a woman. People would rather vote for their own economic demise and livelihood rather than vote for a woman. Don’t give Americans too much credit, the majority of them can’t even fucking read.
Are we just going to ignore that the DOJ had all of these documents while Biden was president and just twiddled their thumbs apparently?
President’s used to let the justice department carry out justice as it saw fit. Now it’s a legal apparatus for the president to weaponize.
That’s a pretty strong claim.
I voted for Harris but you have to be very bad at your job to loose that election.
