• shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Never liked the look of KDE. It is nothing to do with the tech or features. I think qt is a very solid foundation and my current desktop is built on Qt/QML. KDE just feels Windows-ish somehow and that’s probably part of what makes it great for a lot of people. That is a huge win for Linux adoption. Just not for me.

    I always liked Gnome. It was simple and felt fresh even though I hate gtk/gobject etc. And I still keep Gnome as a backup but it think development is being held back by being built on layers of shit.

    After a long time going back and forth I think I am all in on Niri now. Regular tilers never worked for me but somehow scrollers do. It is weird how much of a difference it makes for me. It is possible to build a complete desktop now with Quickshell and a bit of a backend for some services which makes the Gnome desktop and Plasma look crazy over engineered and I don’t know why the Cosmic people even bothered. I don’t see how Gnome can keep up as its is such a horrible system to program. DankMaterialShell is reasonably usable for starters but I might even start working on something. It looks like fun.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      All main desktop environment users triggered in 3…2…1…

      But seriously, as a KDE Plasma user, I have to note it’s extremely customizable. It doesn’t have to look or behave like Windows at all, it’s just a default.

      An entirely different look? Sure! All sorts of completely customizable shortcuts? Yep! Tiling? If you so wish!

      The thing that made Plasma my forever choice is that whatever I want to make it, it delivers. It has settings for everything.

      Here are just two examples of the non-standard KDE looks by the way:

      1000108151

      1000108150