You keep asking those leading questions, champ. I’ll keep telling you to go away. That’s what we’re doing this morning.
Keep in mind that Charlie Kirk style question-asking rhetorical style is characteristic of vapid modern right wing thought and not much else. You tell on yourself when you do this.
What? In order to debate something we have to agree on the definition of terminology first. People used to wrongfully define homosexual as synonymous with “paedophile”. So if I went back to the 1950s where that term was being wrongfully used, a “homophobe” would theoretically be simply someone against paedophilia in their eyes. Which isn’t a bad thing. There are different definitions of homophobe throughout history. How would you define it?
You keep asking those leading questions, champ. I’ll keep telling you to go away. That’s what we’re doing this morning.
Keep in mind that Charlie Kirk style question-asking rhetorical style is characteristic of vapid modern right wing thought and not much else. You tell on yourself when you do this.
What? In order to debate something we have to agree on the definition of terminology first. People used to wrongfully define homosexual as synonymous with “paedophile”. So if I went back to the 1950s where that term was being wrongfully used, a “homophobe” would theoretically be simply someone against paedophilia in their eyes. Which isn’t a bad thing. There are different definitions of homophobe throughout history. How would you define it?
Go the fuck away, you keep saying the most horrific shit.
You still haven’t answered my question
Go away, question asker.
Seems like somebody doesn’t have the answers
You leak. That’s why you hide in a church. Now fuck off.
So the definition of homophobe is someone who is incontinent? Why would you be hateful towards someone you perceive to have a medical condition?