So just so we’re all on the same page, withdrawing a legal opinion from a former AG is not the same thing as “removing a section of the state constitution”. An AG’s opinion indicates how their office will apply the law when deciding who and how to prosecute cases, but they don’t even get the final say on how that law is interpreted. The courts do. It’s bad and definitely indicates collusion, but let’s please use the proper language to describe what’s happening.
So just so we’re all on the same page, withdrawing a legal opinion from a former AG is not the same thing as “removing a section of the state constitution”. An AG’s opinion indicates how their office will apply the law when deciding who and how to prosecute cases, but they don’t even get the final say on how that law is interpreted. The courts do. It’s bad and definitely indicates collusion, but let’s please use the proper language to describe what’s happening.