• yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    1 day ago

    Post-industrial Buddhism is what it is. Yeah like it’d be great to do that in a cave or forest or open prairie but who the fuck can afford those things?

    Abandoned buildings are free as long as you don’t fuck with the native inhabitants’ meth.

    • Droechai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I would just worry of asbestos or heavy metal contamination in the buildings, especially if I’m sleeping on or near the floor

      • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Transportation to and from the forest isn’t free.

        Also some places have laws against camping on public land to discourage homelessness and these would likely fall afoul of those.

          • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Yes, but not as many people go to abandoned buildings so you’re less likely to be seen by others and reported.

            • nomy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’d be way more concerned about running into someone in a 'bando than out in the woods though.

              Hiker in the woods is going to go the other way. A homebum in a bando? Who knows how they’ll react.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You’ve never seen an abandoned building in Baltimore, DC Philadelphia, Detroit, or Chicago?

            Outside of the tourist zone you can find wastelands of abandoned buildings.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m not doubting there are abandoned buildings in cities. I’m doubting any city within the US with the exception of the southwest is more than a few miles from a forest.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Oh ok. But to refute your forest idea, while there are forests a few miles outside those cities, you can’t easily walk to them. There also aren’t any forests near those major cities where you wouldn’t immediately be noticed by park rangers if you tried setting up a random tent. Abandoned buildings don’t get daily police sweeps whereas parks do get sweeps because of lost/injured at nightfall when the parks close to everyone without a camping permit. And legal camp sites are very popular so you wouldn’t be getting away from people- like those who have their playlists blasting out their phone while hiking.

      • algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        OP didn’t mean the cost of going there, they meant still paying the bills while going to the forest instead of work

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That’s still going to be a problem living in an abandoned building though. That part doesn’t change regardless of where their friend goes to meditate (unless that place is work I guess)

      • currycourier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Actually the larger parks near me (the only places that have enough trees to qualify as something close to a forest) do cost money (american city metro area)