• LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Since being replaced by AI is inevitable, it would make more sense for us to be figuring out how to make that world work instead of swinging swords at the ocean.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It doesn’t have to be inevitable. You, a gamer, can openly and loudly refuse to buy games that are made with the use of generative AI

      • mke@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Recently, a thread cropped up about indie devs putting “No GenAI used” stamps in their pages, and the amount of people questioning the value of the initiative or outright criticizing it is absurd.

        People saying disingenuous things like “It’s just another tool, I didn’t hear anyone complaining about the brush on photoshop”, and “games already used AI, are you also against procedural generation?” or the ridiculous “I need AI to make things. Why are you all against me learning and growing as a person?”

        There is a vocal, often severely technically-uninformed crowd that strongly likes GenAI, doesn’t care about and refuses to understand the harm it causes, and needs everyone to be like them so they can stop receiving backlash for contributing to creator exploitation.

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And why does it fall on the consumers and workers to figure out how to not exploit people, instead of the companies currently doing it?