• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Problem is it absolutely will turn when the Bluesky owners Jay Graber and Jack Dorsey decide it’s time to cash in. The project started out as a way to start decentralizing twitter, but they never actually accomplished that goal.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Why is it a problem? If a tool is good now, I’ll use it now.

      I don’t stop myself from buying a new axe just because it’ll break eventually, you know what I mean?

      Although obviously if there was an axe that never would break, I’d buy that! But maybe there are trade-offs. Maybe the never-breaking axe has a complicated handle or something. I don’t know, I’m trying my best with the axe analogy to describe Bluesky vs Mastodon. 😅 Hopefully it’s clear enough!

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s a problem for the same reason twitter dying sucks… The network effect is important, and maintaining yours during a slow, piecemeal mass migration is hard. Which is why I’m sticking with mastodon now, despite more of my relevant network being on BS.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We can avoid it ever becoming shit when a wannabe dictator buys it if we make it impossible to sell: like mastodon and other federated options.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Aside from being its founder. I know he left the board, but I haven’t seen any reason to believe he gave up ownership rights.

        • Virkkunen@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Leaving the board of directors is pretty much as giving up ownership rights. He has nothing to do with Bluesky anymore and he makes us sure he doesn’t want to.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It means he doesn’t directly manage it. Proof that he sold his ownership to somebody else would be evidence of giving up ownership rights.