Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org to Memes@lemmy.ml · 10 days agoFusion of [email protected] and [email protected]?feddit.orgimagemessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1482arrow-down155
arrow-up1427arrow-down1imageFusion of [email protected] and [email protected]?feddit.orgPeter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org to Memes@lemmy.ml · 10 days agomessage-square194fedilink
minus-squareblackberry@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·10 days agoisn’t the point of the fediverse to not consolidate?
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 days agoOptions are better than useless limitations (ignoring scope creep)
minus-squarePriorityMotif@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 days agoI created an instance for one specific community so that users won’t be affected by who federates from who (unless you’re a spam instance or something like that) [email protected]
minus-squarePeter_Arbeitslos@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 days agoThere’re some different ideas in the thread now, basically a fediverse type of consolidation.
![Fusion of [email protected] and [email protected]?](https://feddit.org/pictrs/image/d1d07cd7-c35c-4748-87c7-5a20e1c68006.jpeg){kind=link}
isn’t the point of the fediverse to not consolidate?
Options are better than useless limitations (ignoring scope creep)
I created an instance for one specific community so that users won’t be affected by who federates from who (unless you’re a spam instance or something like that)
[email protected]
There’re some different ideas in the thread now, basically a fediverse type of consolidation.