• Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      22 hours ago

      JD is drawing false equivalence, to lead to the conclusion that law doesn’t matter.

      Does a judge plan a military operation? No. But they can establish if it is legal.

      That’s their whole job, to establish if actions violate the law. If they violate the law, they can order them to stop.

      Judges don’t write the law. You don’t like the judge’s ruling? Change the law. Judges don’t write the laws, they just interpret the ones that exist.

      JD is arguing that judges (and by extension, the law, and by extension the fundamental concept of the rule of law) don’t apply to him and Trump. It’s literally an argument for monarchy.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yup. The word “legitimate” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, and he’s just hoping that no one asks the follow up, “How do we determine whether a use of power is legitimate?”

    • Draces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 hours ago

      JD Vance and Trump are doing a power grab to ignore checks and balances that are very basic elementary school level things that their supporters are going to suddenly pretend aren’t a thing

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This is the vice president overlooking the ‘check and balance’ for the executive branch of government defined in the Constitution.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They never really constitutionalised their Supreme Court, which happens to be the cornerstone of their judicative. Now the executive is grabbing power over the judicative, which would essentially deactivate rule of law and separation of powers, basics of democracy.