• Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Mostly it’s their attitude to controversy.

      Brave has had several major issues over the past few years and they didn’t reverse course until press got bad enough for them to make a statement and try for damage control. This includes:

      • Replacing ads on websites with their own, and collecting that revenue

      • Inserting their own referral codes into auto complete when users navigate to Binance

      • Installing an extra VPN service on Windows machines without user consent

      • Sending DNS requests to the local ISP when in TOR mode effectively removing protection against spying

      On top of all that, it’s based on Chromium, which means that Google is in control of their upstream source code.

      • Mr. Zeus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        On top of all that, it’s based on Chromium, which means that Google is in control of their upstream source code.

        you can turn off the google stuff

        Sending DNS requests to the local ISP when in TOR mode effectively removing protection against spying

        there’s other ways of using TOR, and I don’t even think they do that anymore, they fixed the problem after the criticism came out

        Installing an extra VPN service on Windows machines without user consent

        Been using Brave for over 6 years now, that never happened on any of my machines

        Replacing ads on websites with their own, and collecting that revenue

        they don’t do that anymore, and honestly, I’d rather have it that way than allow google or facebook or any other website to have more money, but adblocking needs to be multi-layered anyway.