• manicdave@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m glad journalists are starting to ask, but I’d rather they’d get to the point.

    Surely it’s very bad for British interests for us to send an ambassador to a country where said ambassador is almost certainly blackmailable by said country’s intelligence agencies.

    • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      British interests

      You mistakenly think (understandably, because that’s what we’re taught, but that doesn’t make it true) that those are your interests, or even society’s interests, but they are neither. They are the interests of the owners of this country, the royals, the other gentry and land owners, and otherwise filthy rich. Theirs are the only interests the state serves.

      • manicdave@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Well my cynical side thinks that the government have thought about this and are absolutely fine with it because they actively want Britain to be servile little piggies to the US. My theory on Trump not bringing us into his stupid trade war is because we just give them so much already that inspiring the British public to get angry about it would cost the US far more than they could possibly gain.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          History. An honest appraisal of the fact that humans mostly work towards goals of self interest. Even capitalism agrees to that… It’s half the point.