Confidentiality. Or porn. One of those things.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      yeah this whole article was an unnecessary rant which the author realized only after publishing.

      Update: A reader writes in with an obvious comment that did not occur to me:

      The obvious reason not to let people put things on the screens you own in public is that invariably people will put porn on them, and then you’ll have other people complaining that the united screen system is showing porn. They don’t say this because no corporate PR hack is going to talk about porn when it’s not necessary. But it’s definitely the real reason, and it’s one they will not and should not budge on.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Then you’ll still have people screencast porn to their own screen, photograph it and post it on social media with a title like “United’s in-flight entertainment”.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would be pretty easy to require accepting a screenshare with a button press on the target screen. So I don’t think trolling other people’s displays is the main concern.