I mean… I kinda get it, but nowadays it’s starting to get absurd.

(EDIT: This was supposed to be a “blow air out my nose and get on with my life” meme…)

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    these are the reasons I think this happens:

    • their numerous accusations of spyware
    • their government being fucked up (especially their censorship)
    • being known for making a lot of mass-produced garbage for cheap
    • the working conditions in those factories being horrible
    • regular racism (which may be caused by the above)

    edit: reworked comment into bulleted list instead of run-on sentence

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago
      • their government being fucked up (especially their censorship)

      I would love to discuss this with anyone that’s willing. If their government is as awful and fucked up as everyone says why does the average Chinese citizen generally have a better life than the average American in their respective societal totem pole (in cities specifically) ?

      They have far more purchasing power for food, rent. Their healthcare is affordable. While censorship is a thing towards certain topics, there certainly isn’t a lack of discussion. They have far better public transit systems, far more parks, and public utilities, absolute ownership (no property tax).

      To me it seems we’re continuously demonizing the lives of those we don’t understand who are actually far better off than most of us in the states.

      • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        I would love to discuss this with anyone that’s willing. If their government is as awful and fucked up as everyone says why does the average Chinese citizen generally have a better life than the average American in their respective societal totem pole (in cities specifically) ?

        Because the social contract of 21st century authoritarian societies is “We give you prosperity, you do politics through gov-approved channels.” Punishment for dissent depends on how insecure the state feels right now.

        On the plus side, the government cares about your prosperity. As long as it lasts, elites can divide power among themselves however they like.

        On the minus – society doesn’t control its government (power transition happens by committee, not elections) and it can’t force any kind of change when elites are against it. Modern states have so much repression power, they can shut down any activism when they don’t mind bloodstains.

        And when prosperity ends, the new contract will be “Do as we say and nobody gets tortured”. source: Im russian

      • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Quite frankly, I think you’re failing to see that a major part of American culture, a literal founding principle, is “live free or die”. Americans are obviously not going to take that censorship as just a small downside.

        Quality of life is less important than freedom.

        absolute ownership (no property tax).

        This is also just a lie. They don’t own land.

        • liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          We, in fact, do own land. We just have an explicit contract with our government vs the implicit one people in the US have. Look into imminent domain seizures in the US.

          • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            …you know that a lease isn’t ownership right?

            Look into imminent domain seizures in the US.

            Yes, they can take land you own… That doesn’t mean you don’t own it lol. Just because you can lose something doesn’t mean you don’t own it. And that’s a lot more niche a situation then you’re thinking it is

            • liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              …the ‘lease’ is that you don’t own it independent of the government, as in despite owning the land you’re not your own country. You’ll find this in every country, except in China it’s spelled out. It has an expiration since, you know, China tends to reform itself over time. None have expired, and right now under current law none of them can expire, they are automatically renewed to the owner at the time of expiry, with the assumption the owner isn’t going to commit treason.

              Like the ‘social credit score’ nonsense you people made up, it’s a gross misinterpretation of reality that you believe because you fundamentally believe Chinese people are different than you.

              • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                you believe because you fundamentally believe Chinese people are different than you.

                ??? Fascist government vs democracy (fingers crossed we stay one) and you think there isn’t a difference? Man you’ve been swallowing some serious propaganda. It’s not about the people, it’s about the government.

                You’ll find this in every country

                No, you won’t. It’s a different system. I’m not going to say it’s a worse system, because it’s not really, it’s just a different system. But you need to recognize that it is substantially different. A lease is different from pure ownership. There’s a lot less guarantees involved.

                • liyunxiao@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  By no definition of fascism is China fascist. Reread your Eco.

                  The government is the people. A fifth of the Chinese public are cpc members. It costs nothing to join, there are no requirements besides being a citizen and not being a convicted traitor. Anyone can join and start voting and participating.

                  And again, no, it’s not a different system. I get that you’re angry you’ll never own your home in the US, whereas 92% of Chinese adults over 21 own their own home, but that doesn’t change reality. The ‘lease’ is that your land is under the Chinese government, not the US government or Russians government, and thus subject to the laws in China and can be revoked if you use your land in a revolution against China.

                  Every single country on earth has this clause. Every single one. China assigns it per deed, rather than an overarching law, because of the autonomous districts that have different leases, like Tibet or Xinjiang.

                  • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 hours ago

                    It’s clear you’ve been extensively propagandized to think china isn’t fascist. I’m not sure if I can discuss with someone who cannot see how their own country is run …

                    The government is not the people .

                    I get that you’re angry you’ll never own your home in the US,

                    … I’m on track to get one in 2 years.

                    Every single country on earth has this clause. Every single one

                    …no

                    You’re still ignoring how china can and has disappeared or block people from the country simply for expressing their views, and used “police forces” to enforce their laws upon citizens in other territories