Office space meme:

“If y’all could stop calling an LLM “open source” just because they published the weights… that would be great.”

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If we’re specifically saying that open source means you can recreate the binaries, then data is fundamentally not able to be open source

    lol, are you claiming data isn’t reproducable? XD

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      … Did you not read the litteral next phrase in the sentence?

      since it distinctly lacks any form of executable content.

      Your definition of open source specified reproducible binaries. From context it’s clear that I took issue with your definition, not with the the notion of reproducing data.