• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Once again, the “don’t show too much gay” policy they seem to have forced them to show a relationship through actual intimacy, in contrast to the usual “relationship=sex” that shows usually have (which we can see with most heterosexual relationships in the same show, for example). Even the doctor that is portrayed by an actor that, let’s say, likes to show his body (most of the google results are him half naked) was not sexualized stupidly like they usually would ; a positive thing, except that it’s probably only because they don’t want to “show the gay” (Book for example is always naked and fucking).

    So yeah, taken independently it’s a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it’s pretty horrible.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      So yeah, taken independently it’s a better relationship image than most relationships in most shows, but in the context it’s pretty horrible.

      Absolutely. I think a lot of the audience realize that if they weren’t a gay couple, we would see them with their shirts off together at every opportunity.

      The silver lining is that the actors are so attractive and doing such a beautiful and convincing job, that the omission makes the show runners look prudish and silly.