happysl.app
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 months ago

Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy"

www.newsweek.com

external-link
message-square
271
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
1.17K
external-link

Luigi Mangione prosecutors have a jury problem: "So much sympathy"

www.newsweek.com

return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 months ago
message-square
271
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
A former prosecutor has said he has never seen so much sympathy for a person accused of murder.
  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s the jury working exactly they way it should

    • vikingr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 months ago

      Right, not sure what they’re complaining about.

      They’re just going to keep going through jury pools until they can find enough bootlickers, which seems to be the antithesis of the “jury of your peers” system.

      His peers find his actions justifiable. The rich can get over it.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Jurors have to be approved by both the defense and the prosecution. They will not get a 100% bootlicker jury

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          On this particular case they will find a way. A little nudge here, a few background checks moved to the top of the queue there. I think the way it works is that lawyers have only so many chances to reject a jury candidate and then they run out of rejections. Thats what I saw on TV anyway.

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            No. Again, either the prosecutor or the defense can reject any juror

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I agree, but isnt it true that either side only gets the opportunity to reject so many candidates before they lose the option to reject? They cant just keep on rejecting forever right?

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                There is no rule, only a judge that may get annoyed

                • kreskin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I think we’re each half right, theres some nuance. I finally goiogled it like I should have from the start. Heres a law office talking about it in New York:

                  https://www.oginski-law.com/library/jury-selection-can-i-excuse-jurors-if-i-dont-like-them-.cfm#%3A~%3Atext=You+see%2C+each+attorney+gets%2CHow+cool+is+that?

News@lemmy.world

news@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.76K users / day
  • 9.12K users / week
  • 16.2K users / month
  • 33.1K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 29.3K subscribers
  • 27.5K Posts
  • 680K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • rjc@lemmy.world
  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • jeffw@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Wren@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org