• LiteralGrill@sakurajima.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      @Even_Adder @alphacyberranger Unrelated, but wow does it feel cool seeing an article I wrote years ago randomly liked when I check out the Fedi on a random morning!

      While it has never been confirmed to be the case to my knowledge, a LOT of folks thought it was for sure.

      • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think you laid it out pretty well. There was no motivation given, the people were just bad because they were bad. It didn’t sit well with me, and a short while later I found all this and the pieces fell into place. It’s pretty ugly stuff and the kind of thing you issue a retraction for, and to my knowledge there is none.

        Edit: Bro had to be aware of the problems and let it go to print, then on air with no alterations.

  • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Just for a tweet from 2 years ago? Seems a little extreme. Was this person that influential that people actually started thinking this?

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Japan has really strict defamation laws. You can somehow get in trouble just for staying verified facts if they make someone look bad. Japan is fucked.

      • BonerMan@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        If you can verify a fact its not illegal unless in very specific circumstances.

        Calling someone a pedophile without any proof and just because you hate them is very obviously not ok and will get you in legal trouble in almost every country in the world.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Slander is spoken. Written, it’s libel.

        And there’s a difference between libel and stating facts about someone that they don’t like. I can’t say for certain which those tweets are, especially since I can’t actually read them right now.

      • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You may as well sue everyone then, especially on the internet and even more so on Twitter. To sue randos on the internet as a famous person because someone said something bad about you is just wild and petty, unless it did considerable harm to your reputation.

        • Kuinox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not because internet become the wild west that bringing law is “wild and petty” defamation is illegal irl, and on internet.

        • BonerMan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Calling other people pedophiles without anything backing that would get you a lawsuit even in USA, in every other country in the world much more so.

          Its good that you cant just talk whatever shit you like about a person, especially regarding such extreme topics like pedophilia.