8tpercent@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoPasswordslemmy.worldimagemessage-square247fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down1110file-text
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imagePasswordslemmy.world8tpercent@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square247fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoTons of websites reject pseudo randomly generated passwords, too
minus-squareBetty White In HD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoWhich ones, so I can stay away lol? I don’t think I’ve ever seen one. I’ve seen a couple silly max or special character limits, which is why a lot of password generators have a toggle or a slider for those.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThat’s inherently blocking pseudo random password generators. Max length doesn’t bother me if it’s at least 128 characters, but only allowing specific special characters is a sin. As of last year, Wells Fargo’s passwords were even cause insensitive. Dunno if they’ve fixed it since then, but probably not
Tons of websites reject pseudo randomly generated passwords, too
Which ones, so I can stay away lol?
I don’t think I’ve ever seen one. I’ve seen a couple silly max or special character limits, which is why a lot of password generators have a toggle or a slider for those.
That’s inherently blocking pseudo random password generators.
Max length doesn’t bother me if it’s at least 128 characters, but only allowing specific special characters is a sin.
As of last year, Wells Fargo’s passwords were even cause insensitive. Dunno if they’ve fixed it since then, but probably not