• gianni@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Wouldn’t Signal or SimpleX be a better alternative to Matrix?

      Given the state of Matrix clients and Matrix is designed to be federated (plus self-hosting is not simple and requires it’s own security precautions).

      • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        If you’re running a multimillion dollar drug operation and you’re too incompetent to set up, or too cheap to pay someone to do in your place what most home-labbers could with a couple hundred bucks of hardware, then you’re going to get caught and you probably deserve it.

        Realistically xmpp over i2p or tor on a disposable live-booting OS would be the best answer. Shit even a one-time-use pay-as-you-go gas station burner woulda been better in most cases. Failing that, you should at least plant yourself in a corrupt enough country and just pay off the local law-enforcement.

        If you can’t do opsec and own your own comms, then why the fuck would you break international law like that?

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Wouldn’t Signal or SimpleX be a better alternative to Matrix?

        Better how? Signal is more user-friendly and stores less metadata but is centralized and dependent on Signal’s servers.

        Don’t know much about SimpleX

        • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          SimpleX as a very user friendly interface, uses decentralized server, does not requires your phone number or email and the server is really easy to set up (but not needed, for the regular user it just looks like any other messaging app)

          Edit: I forgot to say that their app AND servers are open source.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                So it’s a VC-backed for-profit that plans to go freemium. Seems like a good reason not to use it to me.

                  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    I think a fork happening in a few years would be great, right now the app still need a bit of polishing but they are quickly improving it.

                • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  Yes, having a purely non-profit foundation from the start would have been better.

                  But, for me, it is still a better option than Signal or Matrix for messaging.

                  Signal is great but they need 10s of millions every year of donations. It means that they rely on the generosity of wealthy individuals to keep going. I’m worried it is not sustainable.

                  Matrix is better on this aspect since everything is open source, but the UC is not great on my opinion and I don’t fell comfortable switching to it for regular contract with family and friends. To be fair it’s been a while I haven’t used it so I downloaded Element but I am blocked on the account creation (the verification email is not arriving).

                  To compare I tried creating a new account with SimpleX and in less than a minute I was ready to chat. They rely on investors for now and don’t have a clear business model which is worrying but they are developping fast this way and being fully open source anyone could fork it at any time. The UX is great despite being heavily focused on privacy and security and have features that no other app have, you don’t need an email or phone to chat and if they ever start to enshitify someone can fork it.

                  Do pragmatically I think it is the best alternative right now and I am curious to see how they evolve.

        • gianni@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Simpler to manage and smaller attack surface.

          Running your own Matrix server also means running your own host server, database, caches, reverse proxy, firewall, networking stack, etc… Keeping these things running and updated. As well as vetting and updating clients.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Don’t have to run your own server, you can choose from any of hundreds of public ones.

                  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    Correct… So put EVERYONE into one basket… Or split everyone up into multiple baskets…

                    Now I dunno about your mom… But mine told me to not put all my eggs into one basket.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                22 days ago

                Yeah, actually. Will be a lot harder to track it back to you if you’re one of thousands of random users on a public server rather than one you’re hosting using your personal information.

                • gianni@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  How is it a lot harder to track if the FBI can just subpoena the sysadmin for server/room logs?

                  With respect, this viewpoint is not defensible from an operational security perspective.

                  It’s like saying they should use GMail because they have hundreds of millions of users. When the problem isn’t being a needle in haystack, but rather the fact that Google will gladly look through your private data and happily hand it over to the authorities.

                  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    21 days ago

                    How is it a lot harder to track if the FBI can just subpoena the sysadmin for server/room logs?

                    1. What would stop them from subpoenaing all information from your personal server?
                    2. There’s no personal information tied to your account. The server does not have your IP, your email, your CC, etc.

                    With respect, this viewpoint is not defensible from an operational security perspective.

                    “With respect”, ya don’t know what you’re talking about.

                    It’s like saying they should use GMail because they have hundreds of millions of users.

                    Except it’s not like that at all because Gmail is going to collect all the information about you they possibly can and Matrix is going to do the opposite.

          • endofline@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            I tried to use tox cli client and it’s barely usable. Gui clients just half baked barely products. Adding to the piling bad reputation of the development team ( some fraud, adding backdoor ip leaks ) I think it’s enough to bury tox

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 days ago

              Some time ago the project itself seemed nice (toxcore github included) and there were a few nice little clients which even worked, ratox was especially cool (a fifo client), I’ve made an attempt to switch friends\family to tox back then, and we used toxic and utox for voice calls with one my friend instead of skype.

              However, since then it seems as if the changes were not positive.

              It’s really sad, because it felt as the closest thing to come ideologically to replacing skype with a free and open source technology. I’d say something architecturally similar to tox plus activitypub-connected directory\identity (and maybe history) servers would be a success.

              • endofline@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                I agree with you. The idea of tox was great, unfortunately implementation was not that much. Indeed imo loss for messanger apps / protos ecosystem