“Joby took a pre-production prototype of one of its battery-electric aircraft and outfitted it with a liquid hydrogen fuel tank and fuel system. The modified, hydrogen-powered VTOL was able to complete a 523 mile flight above Marina, California…”

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    While hydrogen is expensive to produce, it can be produced from reusable sources or surplus energy which makes it way cheaper and way cleaner. Also solves energy storage. A side note: ICE is around 20% efficient. I’m also sure that flying in choppers and private jets is not that clean and efficient. And yes, cars would be better, but both can coexist.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      True, but that would require building expensive infrastructure that would sit idle for most of the time while we wait for the surplus - assuming we talk intermittent renewables.

      Sure enough, hydrogen fuel cell is cleaner than ICE, my objection was to the form of transportation that might require so much power an ICE car would be a better alternative (but not an ICE air taxi, to be clear)

      Cars would be better, but both can coexist

      From an ecological perspective, they can not, and that’s what this “invention” pretends to be about. Also, cars too are far from perfect, but at least better than this monstrosity