• scrion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    What I don’t understand: if you look at the lab reports posted by the vendor, it will mention that it contains no alkaloids:

    a) Why the hell would you buy this stuff, from a company callef “Shruumz”, if it does not contain, e. g. psilocybin / psilocin? Best case, the product does absolutely nothing and you have been duped. Worst case, it does something, but based on a completely different substance / synthetic compound that you know nothing about.

    b) If you get a lab report and test for amanita analytes, why is the test profile so narrow? Obviously, a different lab found something after the edibles turned out to be a huge health risk.

    Even better, when I opened the lab report for a random product, all it had was results for cannabinoid testing, finding absolutely none - incredibly surprising for a product marketed as shroom edible. Why would a consumer expect or even be interested in cannabinoids in such a product?

    Just a shitty company with highly shady business practices. People, don’t buy edibles with research chemicals or analogs.

    • Thr questions posed here are somewhat rhetorical - I know they’re exploiting a legal loophole. But, still: why endanger your health and ruin the experience like that?
    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s amanita, not advertised as psilocybin iirc. There are tons of “legal shrooms” that are just amanita

      • scrion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The lab reports show the products contained 4-AcO-DMT, a research chemical that is supposed to be metabolized to psilocin.