• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    But that doesn’t reflect on the content of the story itself. Shouldn’t that be what really matters?

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No, I didn’t get to read just the story by itself. The story itself was published in a format that was unnacceptable, imo. This is a symptom of the disease plaguing the modern world, automated and profit-first systems pushing and begging for another moment of our attention at the cost of composure and ethics.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m criticizing Journalism. Period. This is a part of journalism, how they format and ship content is a huge part of journalism.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not according to any dictionary I’ve ever seen.

            That’s like saying newspaper classified ads are journalism.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The ad part? No.

                Hence it saying “writing for newspapers” not just newspapers.

                Again, based on your claim, classified ads are journalism. Absolutely no one but you would even suggest such nonsense.