My original question was “How do we disincentivize the purchase of pickup trucks/SUVs” but then I thought it would be better to approach the larger problem of car dependency and car ownership. One option is, of course, to create public transit infrastructure and improve it where it already exist. This, however, doesn’t change the fact that some will still choose to drive. What would be the best ways to discourage people from owning personal cars?

  • Zikeji@programming.devEnglish
    62·
    9 days ago

    I don’t think there is a “best way” - but increasing costs is one way. Singapore is an example of this - you have pay up 106K SGD for the COE (certificate of entitlement) to even be allowed to own a car.

    • snooggums@midwest.socialEnglish
      42·
      9 days ago

      This punishes the poor in rural areas. Unless you are referring to only cities that will also be improving mass transit at the same time, increasing costs has only downsides.

      • Zikeji@programming.devEnglish
        7·
        9 days ago

        I was offering an example. In Singapore it works because it’s a tiny country with stable mass transit. Definitely not a model that works in countries with more land.

      • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.socialEnglish
        32·
        9 days ago

        Reframing reducing subsidies as increasing costs is what makes people hate the idea. Gradually reducing incentives to drive would give people plenty of time to transition to other lifestyles.