• Sakychu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Are “homo sapiens sapiens” then “ugly ugly caveman” or “ugly caveman man”?

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      Although, debatably, homo neanderthalensis is not a subspecies of homo sapiens, thus negating the need for a homo sapiens neandterthalensis and homo sapiens sapiens classification differentiation to exist, making homo sapiens always the modern man (who yes, is also an ugly caveman) and homo neanderthalensis the most recent full time ugly caveman.

    • whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      I suppose that :

      1. “ugly ugly caveman” -> homo sapiens neanderthalensis
      2. “ugly caveman man” -> homo sapiens sapiens