So, Telegram has launched horrible ads that look a lot like spam to me. At least in my channels it’s typically some crypto bullshit. So, I wonder if people know about alternatives to the subscription service for blocking them? Sadly, Forkgram won’t offer that option and it doesn’t seem to be allowed. However, I wonder if there are still forks out there which block the ads? Or do people know of alternative options?

    • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      My only problem with Signal is the inability to manually sync conversations. Even if I have backups from my phone. They can’t be used on the desktop. I have seen some third party tools, but even those state that they might not work.

    • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I use telegram mainly for info channels and tickers. To my knowledge that’s not possible in Signal, because you can’t restrict participants to be read-only (right?)

      • john_lemmy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I saw people using signal for announcements only by restricting posting messages to group chat admins. Is that similar to what you’re looking for?

      • moreeni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can do that, but Simplex has a limit on the amount of users in a group due to encryption. There is no point in using an e2ee messenger for public announcements

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem with Signal is that the UX isn’t up to par aesthetically and the problem with SimpleX is that the UX is overly complicated. People want a great chat app first and foremost, privacy is an afterthought.

      • kia@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        What about Signal’s UI isn’t up to par aesthetically?

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Same question. I checked out Signal not a long time ago and it was really good looking. The only thing regular users may not like is the encryption key verification thing but it’s not really a UI issue.

          • sqgl@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Definitely a UI issue because it is not clear what the user is supposed to do according to the UI.

            Should I be sitting physically next to the person to confirm? Read out the gazillion character code to them over a regular phone call?

              • sqgl@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                If they are the only two options then it isn’t practical. Wouldn’t six characters be enough? One in 56,800,235,584 chance of guessing and brute force attacks could be avoided with a limit of 3 tries per hour.

                EDIT: Or I could just content myself with the first 6 characters matching. I suppose there is my solution.

          • kia@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Set the navigation bar size to compact and this looks much better.

      • shekau@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Many people use TG specifically because it has unlimited cloud storage. Signal doesn’t offer this (don’t know about SimpleX).