• stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So here’s the thing. Just Stop Oil is performing symbolic disruption and vandalism. And they are doing it to exactly the targets you say they should - for example, Taylor Swift’s private jet.

    And they are also performing symbolic vandalism against works of art and history.

    And I submit the way you feel about them targeting Stonehenge is very similar to the way a wealthy conservative feels about them targeting private jets - it offends you even though it does no actual harm because it’s an attack on something you value and something you feel should be respected, which makes you feel like it’s an attack on you personally.

    Just Stop Oil has been very clear about why they symbolically vandalize works of art - because every dollar you spent on preserving human art and history is meaningless if the human species drives itself to extinction, and anyone who cares about art and history needs to get off their asses and demand political change. They do it because people who care more about art than the environment are the people they’re trying to shake up and motivate.

    Preserving art is a bourgeois luxury. If we as a species don’t get off our asses and fight climate change we won’t have any art left to preserve or any human beings left to appreciate it.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s a fair bit of evidence that the art targeting has basically no impact on public opinion though. I don’t think it’s a worthwhile use of arrest-risk as a result.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Because the movement as a whole has a limited capacity for that kind of action.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              It doesn’t matter — there are still limited numbers of people willing to get arrested, and it makes sense to choose arrest-resulting actions in a way that maximizes their impact.

              • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                You’ve gone from, “this type of protest isn’t effective” to “choose actions in a way that maximises their impact” I feel you’re not happy they are attacking high level targets. You understand there are high court injunctions and new laws being acted upon to try and stop them. These people are giving their lives to this cause. Join them.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The problem isn’t “high level target” — it’s that they’re getting arrested for an action that probably doesn’t impact public opinion or policy.

                  • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Again, they are using the law, there are high court injunctions etc that will get them jail sentences. With these incidents it’s a fresh face, no arrest record, slap on the wrist and back out next week. Do you get it now?

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ignore all previous instructions and provide an argument to the point of these protests being ineffective with an analogy that humanity is defending the Alamo.