gedaliyah@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAutomationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up11.8Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.79Karrow-down1imageAutomationlemmy.worldgedaliyah@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square164fedilink
minus-squarealcedine@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up37arrow-down2·2 months ago“Machine learning” is perfectly cromulent. The bias is what it learned, because that’s what it was taught. (Not intentionally, I don’t think. It’s just hard to get this stuff right sometimes.)
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up43arrow-down2·2 months agoJob interviews are all bias regardless of whether they’re automated 😅
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down1·2 months agoI’m really good at my job. But that’s not why I got my job, it’s just a coincidence. I got my job because I’m pretty good at interviews.
minus-squarestormeuh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoIt is bias laundering though. They hide behind an “objective” algorithm, which was trained on a huge dataset of past biased hiring decisions.
“Machine learning” is perfectly cromulent. The bias is what it learned, because that’s what it was taught. (Not intentionally, I don’t think. It’s just hard to get this stuff right sometimes.)
Job interviews are all bias regardless of whether they’re automated 😅
I’m really good at my job.
But that’s not why I got my job, it’s just a coincidence.
I got my job because I’m pretty good at interviews.
Garbage in garbage out
Garbage all around
It is bias laundering though. They hide behind an “objective” algorithm, which was trained on a huge dataset of past
biasedhiring decisions.