fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agoZero to heromander.xyzimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up1888arrow-down117
arrow-up1871arrow-down1imageZero to heromander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 months agoBut there are an infinite number of things that you don’t have any of, so if you count them all together the number is actually not zero (because zero times infinity is undefined).
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoThere’s a limit to the number of things unless you’re counting spatial positioning as a characteristic of things and there is not a limit to that.
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months agothere’s no limit to the things you don’t have, because that includes all of the things that don’t exist.
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoOnly if you’re able to define things that don’t exist by infinities.
But there are an infinite number of things that you don’t have any of, so if you count them all together the number is actually not zero (because zero times infinity is undefined).
There’s a limit to the number of things unless you’re counting spatial positioning as a characteristic of things and there is not a limit to that.
there’s no limit to the things you don’t have, because that includes all of the things that don’t exist.
Only if you’re able to define things that don’t exist by infinities.
I am.