• KirbyProton@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This view kinda confuses me, I’m not a landlord don’t worry! If people can’t afford a house then what are they expected to do? It’s all well and good saying if you can’t afford the repairs then you shouldn’t be a landlord but if you can’t afford a house, what then, does the same sentiment apply?

    It seems to me it’s very much a problem with the ‘system’ . Aiming your hate at landlords in general makes no sense when they aren’t the reason you don’t own a house in the first place. Obviously some people do take advantage of others, that’s not what I mean.

    What is the solution here?

    If I could wave a magic wand, I’d limit the number of houses people could own and how much wealth any 1 person could have…

    But the problem still stands, people need enough money to get a house in the first place… So how does that work?

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Aiming your hate at landlords in general makes no sense when they aren’t the reason you don’t own a house in the first place.

      They are, in some cases, the reason people don’t own houses. Not in every case of course, but certainly in some. I think there have even been “rent-to-own” scams by some landlords.

      I honestly don’t know what the landscape would look like without landlords, but that’s not a prerequisite to hating on and moaning about greedy landlords and their greedy ways.

      • Smk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Landlords were not a problem 30 years ago and suddenly, they are. The problem is not landlord. Removing landlords won’t magically fix everything for you. This view is radical and unproductive. This will lead the community no where near a real solution to this crisis.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Removing landlords won’t magically fix everything for you.

          Funny that, because I bought a condo and removed landlords from my life and it did actually fix everything for me.

          The problem isn’t just the landlords, it’s a regulatory and policy environment that has shifted since Reagan toward the well off at the expense of everyone else in just about every facet of life including housing. People are pissed at this point because it’s completely unaffordable to live while some of you (I’m going to assume you’re a landlord because of your tone) are hording tons of houses to profit off of.

          • Smk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            All I’m saying is banning landlords is idiotic and won’t solve the crisis. If you can’t pay the rent, you won’t be able to buy a property.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you can’t pay the rent, you won’t be able to buy a property.

              Not always. Sometimes it’s cheaper to buy than rent. It was like that briefly in 2018-2020 where I live.

              I’m not calling for banning landlords anyway, go ahead and have those pointless debates with people who have no power to do so up the thread a bit.

        • caffetiel@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they were problems 30 years ago, too; it was just masked by other factors. Don’t confuse your lack of awareness of a position with that position’s nonexistence.