• bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Either that or our guy just wanted help in the rent and didn’t wanna have her have a claim to it under common law or something (ianal)

    • agarorn@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? Is she also getting a percentage of the house in compensation for that?

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A guy like who? This random girl’s random friend’s “boyf?” That’s not specific enough for me to believe your claim.

        Honestly I’m not even sure if it’s specific enough for me to believe her claim, but if either is true good on “Boyf.”

      • SrElsewhere@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Okay, the people have spoken. And I hear you.

        You want the guy to have a mortgage.

        So our fraudster now definitely has a mortgage.

        • SrElsewhere@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The voters continue to speak! And they’re unhappy. This is unacceptable.

          To placate those angered by the probability of there being a mortgage while simultaneously assuaging the concerns of there not being a mortgage, our guy now may have a mortgage. But here’s the great thing for anyone unsettled by that possibility - he may not!

          May there now be peace and tranquility for everyone so deeply committed to uncovering The True Facts behind shitposts.