I tried a couple license finders and I even looked into the OSI database but I could not find a license that works pretty much like agpl but requiring payment (combined 1% of revenue per month, spread evenly over all FOSS software, if applicable) if one of these is true:

  • the downstream user makes revenue (as in “is a company” or gets donations)
  • the downstream distributor is connected to a commercial user (e.g. to exclude google from making a non profit to circumvent this license)

I ask this because of the backdoor in xz and the obviously rotten situation in billion dollar companies not kicking their fair share back to the people providing this stuff.

So, if something similar exists, feel free to let me know.

Thanks for reading and have a good one.

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    I dont know why my license idea would be funny but thanks for elaborating. I‘ll read up on dual licensing.

        • toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          yes, sorry for the unclear wording.

          We do have funding models for open source and free software. The linux foundation for example takes donations from big players. Its not a forced donation like you suggest, but enough companies see the benefit to fund software they use, so it works. The fsf works a bit like that too, a foundation that, among other things, provides funding for important software. So we do have a way do this, but stuff slips through the cracks, like xz.

          • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks for clarifying. Im mean that is something, which I appreciate.

            Still, I think making something like „FOSS tax“ which applies to companies who use software with this license would break both the software market wide open and tenfold the foss dev crowd because people actually get paid if their controbution is good. The quality of foss software would shoot through the roof.