No copy-pasted definitions please. Use your own words.

  • dope@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because you described attention as “directing your thoughts towards something”.

    But thought is one of the things you can direct attention at.

    So I would put thought in the class of “things that I can direct my attention at”, with no necessary tie to attention.

    Also, “thinking about a thought” looks quite different to me from “directing my attention at a thought”. It looks to me like “directing my attention at a thought about a thought”.

    • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In what way does your second paragraph contradict your first? They seem independent of each other to me. The two together mean that a thought is something that we can attend to, and I believe that’s true in part because I have experienced it.

      I agree that a thought is a thing we can attend to and I don’t know how that could possibly conflict with describing attention as the act of directing thoughts to a particular thing, including to a particular thought. I am, right now, attending to the thought “I don’t understand why this person sees these statements as conflicting with each other” in part because I want to remain curious about why you think these statements conflict with each other, and so I am attending to these thoughts in order to be on the lookout for judgmental thoughts that tend to interfere with being curious.