• sweeny@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    UFOs are confirmed real though, it’s just very difficult to film a super fast moving object in the distant sky. You can barely take a decent picture of a flying bird without thousands of dollars of equipment, let alone a super fast tic tac thingy. And allegedly there is better footage/evidence that the US government has managed to get on UAPs, and Congress is working on getting it disclosed as we speak

    *Guys I didn’t say aliens are real, or that every UFO sighting is real, just that UFOs are real and there are legitimate sightings. The navy has confirmed this, and the scientific community and defense industry are taking these things seriously. We still have no idea what they are though. Hence the unidentified status…

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Air Force? There are definitely UFOs. Now are they local? Or otherworldly? Not sure.

        • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this case op is clearly referring to aliens.

          Otherwise saying UFOs are confirmed real is bit of a conundrum. It’s like saying not knowing the contents of this closed box are confirmed real.

          • GreenMario@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Was definitely referring to aliens. Catching “balloons of unknown origin” aren’t as exciting unless it’s shot down by a F22.

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well yea. Failing to identifying what it actually is makes it unreasonable to say it’s not an alien craft.

            • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s debatable. Are you saying that a closed box has an equal chance to contain an alien than any other object? Is it reasonable to say there is a chance that any closed box is containing an alien? I would say the answer is no.

              • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s a weird way to phrase a question. It’s unknown. Being unknown it could be remote controlled, secret, or not of this world. What is in there? Only who or what is inside would know.

                • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You are suggesting that any flying object, prior to identification, can reasonably be suggested to be of alien origin?

                  I’m saying that it is unreasonable, because we currently have no evidence to suggest that any flying object has been of alien origin. There is no evidence of land based objects with alien origin. There has been no hard evidence in the history of human record to suggest that even a single thing on Earth has ever been linked to extra-terrestrial intelligence.

                  Yet, you are saying that it’s completely reasonable to suggest that any flying object that is yet to be identified by one or more observers has any likelihood of being of alien origin.

                  By extension you have to admit then that any object (whether flying or not), while unidentified, could reasonably be suspected of being of alien origin. So whatever is in that box could be extra terrestrial.

        • Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think people sometimes get confused on the term. “UFO” does not mean the same thing as “alien spacecraft”. Anything in the sky that can’t be identified is a UFO.

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re talking about that one guy who (I think) was in the Navy and was addressing the US Congress, or something.

        It’s a nothing burger and likely just a distraction tactic for other American political stuff.

    • t_jpeg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      UFOs are just Unidentified Flying Objects. This can be anything fron weird weather patterns that manifest weirdly on camera to birds (as you mentioned) that the Air Force/ govt mistook for being potentially something else. Just because a flying object is unidentified doesnt mean it’s an “alien” or anything more nefarious that anyone else may suggest.

      This video did a good job at explaining why the US government has historically hidden “evidence” of “UFOs,” (at least for me anyway). A major reason being to prevent public panic at the height of Cold War tensions.

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want to believe but I’m certain most credible accounts were people seeing experimental aircraft. I’m sure the SR71 and F117 were both seen as UFOs of their day til they were somewhat declassified.