1. Linux
  2. TempleOS
  3. Mac
  4. Intel Management Engine
  5. W.*

EDIT: I’ll add any system that gets at least five votes in the comments. Let’s roll.

  • UsernameNumber@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Modern windows is Linux with a gui that can run windows apps, which is to say it’s actually pretty great imo

    • frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? No! There are nu GNU libs, no Linux kernel but DOS! They use NTFS and do you know by what cruel abonimation of a process they load shared libraries?? Have you ever tried to compile anything besides java in that monstrosity or even properly install a compiler without loosing the complete grasp on reality?

      • UsernameNumber@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok replying to my super old thread now because I hadn’t been checking my inbox. I thought it would be clear that I’m referring to WSL, not the actual windows kernel. It’s tightly integrated enough that you effectively have the windows gui with a Linux shell running the distro of your choice, which is able to access all your windows files, compile and run services for development etc. IMO it’s a MUCH nicer experience than OSX precisely because it’s actual gnu+Linux instead of the crusty bsd stuff that comes with OSX.

        Anyway apologies for the confusion.

    • jerry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It most definitely is not, if you had said OSX I would let it slide because it’s slightly similar, but windows is exactly nothing like you said.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The NT Kernel is not the Linux kernel. You never need to edit a registry in Linux and the default filesystem is just objectively better in Linux