I joined reddit on the tailwind, so it was all echo chamber, we hate newcomers, gatekeeping, automod frenzy, too many rulebreakers, too many rules, etc I could be wrong, but thats what I imagine it used to be like.

  • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know, I’m a pretty left leaning person. The vitriolic, almost violent responses to some of my comments is shocking. I knew Lemmygrad was a thing here, along with tankies, honestly it’s off putting to say the least. OP talks about Reddit being an echo chamber. I got news for you. This place is just as bad for lefty type discourse being regurgitated. My experience is that it has been anything but friendly.

    • Millie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I honestly wouldn’t give those people the dignity of calling them leftists. They’re too concerned about cosplaying as activists and dunking on people to actually give a shit about advancing the rights of real people or trying to protect anything good.

      • gowan@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Seriously the number of people who defend DPRK and Pol Pot claiming they were socialists is shocking.

        Edit: the “they” refers to the nation states not the posters

        • Millie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I feel like those posters aren’t really socialists either. There’s a point which just claiming a worldview isn’t enough to justify the accuracy of that label while holding all the opposing positions to its values.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I see comments like this, complaining about tankies, more often than i see “tankies”.

      On the occasion politics comes up, and i say anything socialist, I’m jumped on by people who seem either angry or smugly dismissive of the notion of people organising.

      • F_this_stuff@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude is a Canadian landlord. But I guess since the right wing has literal nazis now, anything left of that is ‘pretty left leaning’

        • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey, I better not be seeing any disrespect for landchads here. Now you add 5% more rent to this month’s tip, hear me, rentoid?

        • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s shit like this. I’m just a normal guy, I have a job, kids, hobbies. I believe in less military spending, national healthcare, social programs, and support for our vulnerable population. I got into real estate because it seemed like a good investment. People on here make it seem like anything that doesn’t fit their idea of “left” or"socialism" just be part of the conservative machine. Jesus, my investment decisions are not politically motivated. I made the mistake of trying to be part of a discussion and ended up with someone telling me I’m garbage and that I should give my investments to the tenants. Lol.

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Being a landlord is a deliberate choice to make money through other people’s work.

            It’s welfare for the rich.

            That’s not to say you, or any specific landlord, is evil. It’s just an evil thing to do. If you don’t live in the house, you have no business owning it.

            • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unfortunately the same could be said of the stock market. When it comes to financial planning for retirement or longer financial stability, one can choose between real estate or the stock market (among other choices).

              I think the real issue with property ownership is having some reasonable limits and regulations. 1) no foreign investments in certain home types, 2) a cap/limit on the properties owned by any individuals (or LLCs they are associated with), and most importantly a complete ban on corporations owning residential properties.

              Sure we could transition into removing real estate as an investment vehicle, but unfortunately I really can’t see a realistic path to this.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Unfortunately the same could be said of the stock market

                You seem to think I wouldn’t agree there, too. Yes, the same could and is rightfully said about the stock market.

                When it comes to financial planning for retirement or longer financial stability, one can choose between real estate or the stock market (among other choices).

                And that is an indicator of a poorly planned economy.

                I think the real issue with property ownership is having some reasonable limits and regulations. 1) no foreign investments in certain home types, 2) a cap/limit on the properties owned by any individuals (or LLCs they are associated with), and most importantly a complete ban on corporations owning residential properties.

                I mostly agree, but I’d go even further. A single law:

                It is illegal to own a home one does not occupy for more than 9 months of the year; or any holding wherein others are employed to work for a wage; or to monopolise access to resources or facilities necessary for social production

                TL;DR abolish private property.

                Sure we could transition into removing real estate as an investment vehicle, but unfortunately I really can’t see a realistic path to this.

                Right above! You may call that unrealistic, but the only wrinkles are rich bastards being upset they can no longer leech. I don’t believe that worthy of consideration.

            • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And honestly, today I agree with you (although I think there is some merit in a rental system as some people prefer to rent). I haven’t bought a property for 15 years and I see what the younger generation is going through. If I knew then what I know now, I would not have purchased rentals. But at the time the real estate market was much different. Hell there were decent properties for sale for 70k back then.

                • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Honestly? I went into it as an investment, from a capital appreciation stand point I have done very well. I’ve mentioned in another post that I basically charge minimum rent (30% below market). When I had kids I thought the properties would provide decent income for the kids so it would supplement what they earn in the long term. But then one of my children ended up with a life long disability. My properties are in a condo/town house community close to many amenities. It’s very possible they may end up living in one of the properties while the other parts for their expenses. If I had wanted to get out I would have done so last year. But as it turns out I may actually need the properties to ensure my kid doesn’t end up as a disabled homeless person. So at the end of the day, I’m not interested in making money off the properties, I just cover expenses. It’s probably who I’ve had the same tenants for 12 years. I literally don’t even remember their names.

                  • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    This is a pretty good explanation as to why. I feel for your kid too and I hope you do end up just letting them live there so they aren’t homeless as a disabled adult.

                    That kid sounds super lucky though. Other people’s parents don’t necessarily have something like that up their sleeve so when its time to be an adult- that kid just has no where to go or they keep living at home with the parents.

                    I get that you’re not interested in making money off these properties but then you ended on

                    It’s probably who I’ve had the same tenants for 12 years. I literally don’t even remember their names.

                    This is definitely part of why people don’t like landlords and you’re gonna keep getting shut down with the brunt of the argument.

                    The only time I had a landlord that knew my name was one that I was already friends with beforehand. Otherwise it’s a purely transactional relationship. And people don’t like financial relationships. They’re disingenuous. And they lead to statements like “I don’t even know this persons name”

                    Like those people are just nobodies to you that you get rent from.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                some people prefer to rent

                Utter bullshit. The only reason people rent instead of buying is because prices are too damn high.

                And prices are too damn high because of landlords. If you are both problem and solution, your job needn’t exist.

                If I knew then what I know now, I would not have purchased rentals. But at the time the real estate market was much different.

                It was exactly the same, only cheaper. And it was the flood of landlords buying when it was cheap that led to prices getting higher.

                People like you are the reason this problem exists.

                If I knew then what I know now, I would not have purchased rentals.

                You at least deserve credit for admitting this.

          • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jesus, my investment decisions are not politically motivated

            I agree but what you chose to do effects the lives of others. You’re participating in something that is built to hurt people for not being as lucky as you are.

            • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Agreed, especially in today’s market. It wasn’t the case back when I bought the properties. 15 years ago, it was a renters market. Landlords were under pressure, but cheaper prices and low interest rates made it feasible. My first house that I bought was cheaper per month than the apartment I was renting previously.

                  • irmoz@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lmao. The furthest you could possibly get from socialism is nazism. Got any logic or proof to back up your claim? Marxists, socialists, communists and other assorted leftists were among Hitler’s first targets in the night of the long knives. Also, the famous poem, “first they came for the socialists…”

                    Try again.

                  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You must be very confused by the titmouse.

                    Also you have no critical thinking skills or self-awareness. Nothing but the ability to parrot superficial and mindless “talking points” because you’d prefer to be told your fear and bigotry are correct and righteous without actually putting in any thought or self-reflection of your own.

      • ConfuzedAZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just said I knew they were present, I didn’t say I specifically had a problem with them. I personally think that we’re don’t have enough unions. Any time corporations are against something, that usually means it’s good for employees and the environment. (I have no particular opinion on people’s political notions). It’s sad that people here on both ends of the political spectrum can’t voice their opinion without being jumped on. Honestly it’s worse than Reddit.

    • danielton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had several people here already tell me (directly or indirectly) that I’m really a Trump supporter in disguise because I dare criticize Biden and centrists don’t exist. But that isn’t a problem specific to Lemmy, and the sites that aren’t like this are alt-right “Ultra MAGA” cult sites that I want nothing to do with.

    • kucuva@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      lol i put up a post on here and people analyzing it from a “socialist perspective” the thing is i thin kits limited to certain cats [what u call communities] lemmy is like america 1790s, all kinds of people comign in here, some of the rejects from other countries, some criminals, and some opportunity seekers

      • Sarcastik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given your comment I’m not sure if this a positive comment on lemmy or whether you agree with the comment you responded to?

        Someone being banned for arguing politics would never happen on Reddit, so given they were banned from two instances in <6hrs is a land speed record.

        • ✨Abigail Watson✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m agreeing with the person I responded to. I think the community/subreddit setup is prone to echo chambers, and a lot of people assume their bubble’s standards are how the whole site should behave. It can be bad if you’re used to behaving a certain way that’s considered “extreme” outside of your bubble. For example - a video game community may have different social standards than an LGBT community, and two LGBT communities on different instances will be different.

          Politics are prone to attracting extreme behaviors, and I’ve already seen that some democrats here can get just as aggressive as conservatives on reddit. And just like reddit, that aggressive behavior isn’t allowed in all communities. But if it’s not curbed right away it can lead to the entire site having a hostile undertone to every interaction. I don’t know how things will go long term but I’m not a fan of the extremism I’ve seen popping up so far.