A big sticking point in contract talks between Detroit automakers and the United Auto Workers union is the popular assertion that it takes fewer workers to manufacture electric vehicles (EVs) than conventional cars.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    EVs are inherently simpler than ICE vehicles. Of course it will eventually take fewer man hours to build one, and that’s where some of the eventual cost savings will come in from.

    You can’t complain about the high cost of cars today and then turn around and want artificially inflated labor hours for EVs. You can’t have it both ways.

  • style99@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    EVs have fewer moving parts than gas-powered vehicles, with no engines, transmissions or exhaust systems.

    That didn’t stop the light bulb industry from baking in planned obsolescence.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Battery cell manufacturing will be increasingly automated as volumes increase. So this idea didn’t hold water.

    • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean? They’re arguing that EVs require less labour-hours of human work, you’re agreeing with them by saying that battery manufacture will be more automated.