I dont agree with many things apple does at all, and I also think their password manager has flaws like revealing usernames without authentification.

It is pretty handy though, to have a file where the entries are stored unencrypted, and if the password manager detects an entry it prompts to decrypt exactly that field, maybe with a fingerprint.

KeepassDX needs to run in the background and be completely unlocked to even detect apps or password fields.

Do you know any existing app that can do this?

  • Oisteink@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe because it seems you claim self-hosting bit warden is cloud only and that self-hosted is not accessible outside the house?
    Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

    • Vexz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Note: I do not recommending self-hosting bitwarden

      Why not? I have my own instance running on my NAS and I love to have it self-hosted because this way I keep the passwords where I know nobody else can get them.

      • Oisteink@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because a password manager is critical and if you ask me I’d say no. If you have the know how and understand the risk you won’t be asking

        • Vexz@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I work in the IT so I know some stuff about security in the digital world. But these systems (password managers in general) are built to be secure and not just tell every password they store without some security measures. Yes, I know there can be security holes, bugs and so on. But that’s why these tools get thoroughly tested.
          You always have to take risks in the world of computers. So what’s the point? Being as secure as possible? Then better not even bother with password managers at all because they all can have security holes.
          It’s more about how much you trust a password manager and how much you trust yourself in how cautious you use it. The risk is always there.

          • Oisteink@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok. I’m quite the IT person myself, and I can say I’d not recommend you running your own either.

            • Vexz@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s fair. Everyone has a different opinion. But I think it’s always better to self-host Bitwarden than using the cloud service because then your passwords are stored in a place where you have full control of. Afaik if you use the official Bitwarden vault your passwords are stored on some Amazon servers.

              • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Self hosting is not for everyone. You need to understand backup, redundancy and recovery. That would be the main reason I don’t recommend self-hosting. Bitwardens self-hosting package are mature enough for me.

                So it’s more about loosing all your passwords than someone breaking in to your vault

              • Security is only one part of it. If you host a password manager yourself then things like availability, backups, disaster recovery and monitoring also become your responsibility. I’m hosting my own vaultwarden but there is only a very limited amount of people I would suggest self hosting a password manager to, because I know they have the knowledge to do it and understand the risks.